首页> 外文会议>Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences >Comparing Capacity Market and Payment Designs for Ensuring Supply Adequacy
【24h】

Comparing Capacity Market and Payment Designs for Ensuring Supply Adequacy

机译:比较能力市场和支付设计,以确保供应充足

获取原文

摘要

Capacity payments and capacity markets are one mechanism for ensuring that sufficient marginal generation is built to meet peak demands with an adequate reserve margin. The European Union experience with such mechanisms has focused on capacity payment mechanisms, while in the United States the trend has been towards quantity-based mechanisms, especially in the form of locationally-specific, centralized procurement auctions on a forward basis, with the grid operator securing capacity commitments three or four years ahead and allocating costs based on realized peak load. Historically, many of the European and U.S. capacity market designs have been generally ineffectual. Recent American designs have evolved towards contractual mechanisms that guarantee adequate generation investment but at potentially higher costs.
机译:能力付款和能力市场是一种确保建立充足的边缘生成的一种机制,以满足足够的储备保证金的最高要求。欧洲联盟此类机制的经验专注于产能支付机制,而在美国在美国趋势一直朝着基于数量的机制,特别是以前向基础的基于数量的集中采购拍卖的机制,尤其是网格运营商保护能力承诺三到四年,并根据实现的峰值负荷分配成本。从历史上看,许多欧洲和美国能力市场设计一般无效。最近的美国设计已经发展到合同机制,以保证充足的发电投资,但成本更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号