首页> 外文会议>IEEE India Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium >Comparison of Three Remote Sensing Based Multi-Source Evapotranspiration Models
【24h】

Comparison of Three Remote Sensing Based Multi-Source Evapotranspiration Models

机译:三种遥感基于多源evapotranspiration模型的比较

获取原文

摘要

Evapotranspiration (ET) links the energy, water and carbon cycles from local to global scales. Several remote sensing (RS) based models, with varying complexity and underlying physical concepts have been developed. Some of these models estimate total ET and some can partition ET into its constituent components. This study aims to compare three multi-source ET models, Priestley-Taylor-Jet Propulsion Lab (PT-JPL), Soil Plant Atmosphere and Remote Sensing Evapotranspiration (SPARSE) and Surface Temperature Initiated Closure (STIC) for their performance in simulating total ET and its components over four sites. The PT-JPL, SPARSE (layer), SPARSE (patch) and STIC models exhibited RMSE of 89.68, 57.3, 61.67 and 96.43 W m-2 respectively for the four sites taken together at half hourly time scales. In addition to differences in total ET simulated by the models, there was a remarkable difference between them in simulating the E and T components too. This clearly suggests that care must be taken when using these models to simulate ET and its components.
机译:Evapotranspiration(et)将能源,水和碳循环从本地到全球范围链接。已经开发了几种基于遥感(RS)的模型,具有不同的复杂性和潜在的物理概念。其中一些模型估计Total等,有些则可以将ET分配到其组成部分。本研究旨在比较三种多源ET模型,普里斯特利 - 泰勒 - 喷射推进实验室(PT-JPL),土壤植物大气和遥感蒸散(稀疏)和表面温度发起的闭合(STIC)在模拟Total ET中的性能它的组件超过四个网站。 PT-JPL,稀疏(层),稀疏(贴片)和STIC模型表现出89.68,57.3,61.67和96.43 W M的RMSE -2 分别在半小时时间尺度上一起使用的四个站点。除了由模型模拟的Total ET的差异之外,它们也在模拟E和T组件时存在显着差异。这清楚地表明,必须在使用这些模型来模拟ET及其组件时注意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号