首页> 外文会议>Conference on Global Reliability and Prognostics and Health Management >Comparison Research of Feature Fusion Methods in Characterizing Performance Degradation of Aeroengine
【24h】

Comparison Research of Feature Fusion Methods in Characterizing Performance Degradation of Aeroengine

机译:特征融合方法特征性融合性能研究表征的性能下降

获取原文

摘要

Advanced characterization techniques of aero-engine performance degradation play an important role in the aero-engine health management system, which remains to be a great challenge. Monitoring parameter from one signal source usually contains limited health information of the operation conditions, which is probably not suitable for describing the system-level complex equipment. Feature fusion methods can well fuse multisource monitoring parameters, and they are usually applied to overcome the shortcomings of single-source parameters. However, how to select the sensitive single-source parameters of aero-engine for effective fusion has not been fully studied. In this paper, comparison research of six types of feature fusion methods are performed to characterize the performance degradation of aero-engine in this paper, including kernel principal component analysis (KPCA), locality preserving projections (LPP), locally linear embedding (LLE), linear local tangent space alignment (LLTSA) and so on. The effectiveness and differences of these six feature fusion methods are preliminarily investigated with the simulated multi-source performance parameters of aero-engines provided by NASA.
机译:航空发动机性能下降的先进表征技术在航空发动机健康管理系统中发挥着重要作用,这仍然是一个巨大的挑战。来自一个信号源的监测参数通常包含操作条件的有限健康信息,这可能不适合描述系统级复合设备。特征融合方法可以很好地保险丝多源监控参数,通常应用于克服单源参数的缺点。但是,如何选择如何选择有效融合的航空发动机的敏感单源参数。在本文中,进行了六种特征融合方法的比较研究,以表征本文的航空发动机性能下降,包括内核主成分分析(KPCA),位置保存投影(LPP),局部线性嵌入(LLE) ,线性局部切线空间对齐(LLTSA)等。通过NASA提供的Aero-yigines的模拟多源性能参数预先研究了这六种特征融合方法的有效性和差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号