首页> 外文会议>Bioceramics >Effect of Mechanical Mixing and Powder to Liquid Ratio on the Strength and Reliability of a Brushite Bone Cement
【24h】

Effect of Mechanical Mixing and Powder to Liquid Ratio on the Strength and Reliability of a Brushite Bone Cement

机译:机械混合和粉液比对透钙磷骨水泥强度和可靠性的影响

获取原文

摘要

The effect of mechanical mixing on compressive strength, relative porosity and reliability of strength data of a brushite forming cement at different powder to liquid ratios (PLRs) was investigated. Mean compressive strengths were measured, associated reliability (Weibull moduli) and survival probability distributions of the data sets were analysed. Relative porosities were determined using helium pycnometry. For low PLR (2.2g/ml), no significant differences in compressive strength were observed for either mechanical or hand mixed samples, although reliability of the former was significantly increased. At high PLR (3.4g/ml), mechanically mixed cements exhibited approximately twice the mean compressive strength compared with hand mixing, although Weibull moduli remained statistically similar. At medium PLR (2.8g/ml) strength and reliability of cements were similar and independent of mixing regime. For all PLRs, a significant decrease in porosity of mechanical- compared with hand-mixed cements was observed. Mechanical mixing of a brushite cement can provide lower porosity, increased reliability and higher strength.
机译:研究了机械混合对抗压强度,相对孔隙率和不同粉末状粉末成液体比率(PLRS)的强度数据的相对孔隙率和可靠性。测量平均抗压强度,分析了相关的可靠性(Weibull Moduli)和数据集的存活概率分布。使用氦pycnometry测定相对孔隙症。对于低PLR(2.2g / mL),对于机械或手动混合样品,观察到抗压强度的显着差异,尽管前者的可靠性显着增加。在高PLR(3.4g / ml),与手混合相比,机械混合的水泥显示出平均抗压强度的两倍,尽管Weibull Moduli保持统计学相似。在介质PLR(2.8g / ml)的强度和水泥的可靠性相似且与混合制度无关。对于所有PLRS,观察到与手中的水泥相比机械孔隙率的显着降低。金属石渣水泥的机械​​混合可提供较低的孔隙率,增加可靠性和更高的强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号