首页> 外文会议>Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology >Multi-Criteria Assessment of Household Preferences for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: An Analysis of Household Survey Data from Four European Cities
【24h】

Multi-Criteria Assessment of Household Preferences for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: An Analysis of Household Survey Data from Four European Cities

机译:减少温室气体排放的家庭偏好的多标准评估:来自四个欧洲城市的家庭调查数据的分析

获取原文

摘要

Objective To assess household preferences for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions with respect to criteria of C02e emissions, health impact and cost. Setting Mid-size cities in France, Germany, Norway and Sweden (the HOPE project). Method An inventory of 65 GHG reduction actions was assessed using a C02e emissions, health impact and cost calculator for 309 households. The impact of each action on health was graded using a five-point scale (slightly negative, no impact, and three grades of health benefit). Each action was then compared in terms of these three dimensions (C02e reduction, cost, health) using scores which gave alternative priority weightings to each dimension. The results were examined in relation to the proportion of respondents declaring their willingness to implement each action. Results Actions rated most highly on the combined C02e reduction-health-cost score included switching towards an increasingly vegetarian diet, reducing motor vehicle use in favour of public transport and/or walking and cycling, giving up ready meals, and measures to improve insulation of the home (roof, walls, windows). However, most households were unwilling to make substantial shifts towards becoming vegetarian or towards reducing motor vehicle use. Actions that respondents were often willing to implement and scored highly on the three dimensions of impact included: eating 30% more vegetarian food, walking and cycling instead of using public transport, 'eco-driving', and improvements of roof and window insulation. Conclusion Most householders appear willing to make appreciable changes to their lifestyle and home in order to help achieve GHG emissions reductions, including (but not limited to) moderate (not extreme) dietary modification, some reduction in private vehicle journeys, and home energy efficiency improvements. Though such actions may alone not be sufficient to meet pressing GHG reduction targets.
机译:目的根据二氧化碳排放,健康影响和成本的标准,评估家庭在减少温室气体(GHG)排放方面的偏好。在法国,德国,挪威和瑞典设置中型城市(HOPE项目)。方法使用CO2e排放量,健康影响和成本计算器,对309户家庭进行了65项温室气体减排行动清单的评估。每种措施对健康的影响使用五点量表进行分级(轻微的负面影响,无影响和三级健康收益)。然后使用得分为这三个维度(CO2减少量,成本,健康状况)进行比较,从而为每个维度提供替代的优先权重。相对于宣布他们愿意执行每项行动的受访者比例,对结果进行了检查。结果在降低二氧化碳排放量-健康成本总分中,获得最高评价的措施包括转向逐渐增加素食,减少汽车使用以促进公共交通和/或步行和骑自行车,放弃便餐,以及采取措施改善人们的饮食隔热性。房屋(屋顶,墙壁,窗户)。但是,大多数家庭不愿做出实质性转变,以成为素食者或减少机动车使用。受访者通常愿意采取的行动在影响的三个方面都获得了很高的评价,包括:多吃30%的素食,步行和骑自行车而不使用公共交通工具,“环保驾驶”以及改善屋顶和窗户的隔热性。结论大多数家庭似乎愿意改变其生活方式和家庭,以帮助实现温室气体的减排,包括(但不限于)适度(非极端)的饮食调节,减少私家车出行次数以及改善家庭能源效率。尽管仅这些行动可能不足以满足紧迫的温室气体减排目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号