【24h】

Differences in calculation methods of effective emissivity of blackbody cavity

机译:黑体腔有效发射率计算方法的差异

获取原文

摘要

It is very difficult to directly measure the effective emissivity of a blackbody cavity, which is generally calculated by theindirect methods. Different calculation methods have certain differences. In this paper, the STEEP software, TRACEPROsoftware and approximation formula are used to calculate the effective emissivity of the blackbody cavity for the threecommonly used blackbody models of integrating sphere, cylindrical and cylindrical-conical, and Compare the results ofemissivity greater than 0.99. The results show that the consistency of the results of the three methods in calculating thecylindrical type and the integrating sphere type blackbody can be better than 0.03%. When calculating the conical blackbody, the difference between the results of the approximate formula and the other two schemes is less than 0.07%. Thecalculation results of the scheme tend to be consistent with the increase of the emissivity of the model.
机译:直接测量黑体腔的有效发射率是非常困难的,这通常是由黑洞计算得出的。 间接方法。不同的计算方法有一定的差异。在本文中,STEEP软件TRACEPRO 使用软件和近似公式来计算三个物体的黑体腔的有效发射率 常用的积分球,圆柱和圆柱圆锥的黑体模型,并比较结果 发射率大于0.99。结果表明,三种方法计算结果的一致性。 圆柱型和积分球型黑体可优于0.03%。计算圆锥形黑色时 体,近似公式的结果与其他两种方案的结果之差小于0.07%。这 该方案的计算结果趋于与模型发射率的增加相一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号