首页> 外文会议>IAEE International Conference;International Association for Energy Economics >Modelling risk spillover between oil price shocks and stock market returns in the BRICS
【24h】

Modelling risk spillover between oil price shocks and stock market returns in the BRICS

机译:在金砖国家中模拟油价冲击和股市收益之间的风险溢出

获取原文

摘要

OverviewWith the rapid development of futures, options and other derivatives, oil market has become more financialized which is involved into the global financial system. It means oil price changes are not only exogenous shocks to macroeconomic variables, but also exposed to systemic financial risk with other financial markets. Especially, speculative activities and capital flows globally have strengthened their comovement. The 2008 global financial crisis presents a good interpretation that both stock market and oil market have experienced a significant turbulence almost simultaneously affected by the global economic recession. Therefore, research on the relationship between oil price changess and stock market returns has received a increased concern by researchers and market investors, which can provide an useful anticipation for portfolio strategies and risk avoidance.However, following Kilian’s (2009) work, not all oil price shocks are alike. It’s because the causes of oil price fluctuations are different. For example, the impact of hurricanes on oil prices is supply-side shock, the global financial crisis impact on oil prices is aggregate demand shock and the shock from Libyan war is precautionary demand shock (Ji and Guo, 2015). Obviously, different origins of oil price shocks depict different transmission path of depedence structure and risk spillover between oil price shocks and stock market returns. The most previous literatures often follow Kilian’s (2009) frawework and employ SVAR to model the linear and static relationship between oil price shocks and its influences on stock market returns. They ignored the importance of examining the relationship between oil prices and stock markets in a time-varying and nonlinear environment.This paper extends the previous studies and tries to combine dynamic copula models with SVAR model to caputure the dynamic dependence and risk spillover between all oil price shocks and stock market returns in the BRICS countries by measuring upside and downside CoVaR.The paper is organised as follows: After the introduction the second section proposes the research methodology. Section 3 conducts the empirical analysis and the last Section concludes the paper.MethodsIn this paper, the modelling process is divided into three stages. Firstly, Following Kilian (2009), a SVAR model is constructed to decompose oil prices into three type price shocks series, including oil supply shocks, aggregate oil demand shocks and oil market specific demand shocks. Second, CoVaR is bulit to measure the upside and downside spillover risk and four time-varying copula-GARCH models are constrcted to measure the CoVaR. Finally, VaR of stock market returns is also estimated and some tests are made to test the presence of difference between VaR and CoVaR and asymmetry effect between upside risk and downside risk.ResultsIn our empirical findings, the dynamic dependences between three type oil price shocks and five stock market returns in the BRICS present separately characteristics. Firstly, oil supply shocks present smallest dependence with stock returns in the BRICS compared with the other two type oil price shocks. It is in accordance with the fact that oil price shocks are mainly driven by oil market specific demand shocks and then by aggregate demand shocks. Secondly, aggregate demand oil price shocks always present positive depedence with stock returns in Brazil, Russia and india, while that in China and South Africa present both negative and positve depedences. Thirdly, oil market specific demand shocks present largest depedence with stock returns in almost all the five countries. It’s because that oil market specific demand shocks reflect the uncertainty in oil market which include more exogenous information also influencing stock market.When we quantify the VaR and CoVaR risk measures for oil price shocks and stock returns, it’s found that the upside and downside VaR and CoVaR trajectories display a similar trend with slight differences in magnitude for all the BRICS except South Africa. A significant abrupt change is observed during the 2008-2009 period which can be attributed to the global financial crisis. When we compare the difference between VaR and CoVaR for the same stock market, it’s found that there is significant risk spillover effect from oil price shocks to stock markets for alomost all the cases. It indicates that oil market also has a systemic risk for stock market in the emerging countries. Furthermore, we examine the asymmetric effect beteen upside and downside risks. It’s found that there are asymmetric upside-downside risk spillover effects from aggregate demand oil shocks and oil market specific demand shocks to Brazil, Russia and India’s stock markets.ConclusionsIn summary, our empirical results provide strong evidences that the dependences between oil price shocks and stock returns in the BRICS are not constant but instead they vary over time. Especially, the dependence structures between different type oil price shocks and stock returns present different which reinforces our contribution to differentiate the effect of different origins of oil price shocks. Our findings verify the risk spillover effects from oil price shocks to the emerging stock markets and also the asymmetric effect between upside risks and down risks. These findings have importance implications for investors, portfolio managers and market traders.
机译:概述 随着期货,期权和其他衍生工具的迅速发展,石油市场变得更加金融化,并参与了全球金融体系。这意味着油价变化不仅是对宏观经济变量的外来冲击,而且还面临其他金融市场的系统性金融风险。特别是,全球的投机活动和资本流动加强了它们之间的协作。 2008年的全球金融危机很好地诠释了股市和石油市场几乎都受到全球经济衰退的严重动荡。因此,研究人员和市场投资者越来越关注油价变化与股市收益之间关系的研究,这可以为投资组合策略和风险规避提供有用的预期。 但是,在Kilian(2009)的工作之后,并不是所有的油价冲击都是一样的。这是因为油价波动的原因不同。例如,飓风对石油价格的影响是供应方的冲击,全球金融危机对石油价格的影响是总需求的冲击,而利比亚战争的冲击是预防性需求的冲击(Ji and Guo,2015)。显然,油价冲击的起源不同,说明了石油价格冲击与股票市场收益之间的依赖关系和风险溢出的传递路径不同。以前的大多数文献经常遵循Kilian(2009)的框架,并使用SVAR来模拟油价冲击及其对股市收益的影响之间的线性和静态关系。他们忽略了在时变和非线性环境中研究油价与股市之间关系的重要性。 本文扩展了先前的研究,并试图通过将动态copula模型与SVAR模型相结合,通过测量上,下CoVaR来捕捉金砖国家所有油价冲击与股市收益之间的动态依赖性和风险溢出。 本文的组织结构如下:引言之后,第二部分提出了研究方法。第三节进行了实证分析,最后一节对论文进行了总结。 方法 在本文中,建模过程分为三个阶段。首先,根据Kilian(2009),构造了SVAR模型,将油价分解为三种类型的价格冲击系列,包括石油供应冲击,总石油需求冲击和石油市场特定需求冲击。其次,CoVaR擅长测量向上和向下溢出风险,并构建了四个时变的copula-GARCH模型来测量CoVaR。最后,还估算了股票市场收益的VaR,并进行了一些测试以检验VaR和CoVaR之间存在差异以及上行风险和下行风险之间的不对称效应。 结果 在我们的经验发现中,金砖国家的三种类型的油价冲击和五种股市收益之间的动态相关性分别呈现出特征。首先,与其他两种类型的油价冲击相比,金砖四国的石油供应冲击对股票收益的依赖性最小。根据这一事实,油价冲击主要由特定于石油市场的需求冲击驱动,然后由总需求冲击驱动。其次,总需求油价震荡总是表现出积极的消极作用,而巴西,俄罗斯和印度的股票收益率则呈上升趋势,而中国和南非的增长既表现为消极表现,也表现为上升趋势。第三,石油市场特定需求的冲击是最大的障碍,几乎所有五个国家的股票收益率都很高。这是因为石油市场的特定需求冲击反映了石油市场的不确定性,其中包括更多的外来信息也会影响股市。 当我们对油价冲击和股票收益的VaR和CoVaR风险度量进行量化时,发现除了南非以外,所有金砖国家的VaR和CoVaR曲线的上升和下降趋势都显示出相似的趋势,但幅度上略有不同。在2008年至2009年期间,观察到重大的突然变化,这可能归因于全球金融危机。当我们比较同一股票市场的VaR和CoVaR之间的差异时,发现在几乎所有情况下,石油价格冲击股票市场都存在显着的风险溢出效应。这表明,石油市场对新兴国家的股票市场也具有系统性风险。此外,我们研究了上行和下行风险之间的不对称效应。研究发现,总需求石油冲击以及巴西,俄罗斯和印度股市对石油市场的特定需求冲击会产生不对称的上下风险溢出效应。 结论 总之,我们的经验结果提供了有力的证据,表明金砖国家的石油价格冲击与股票收益之间的依存关系不是恒定的,而是随时间而变化的。特别是,不同类型的油价冲击和股票收益之间的依存关系呈现出不同,这加强了我们对区分不同价格源的影响的贡献。我们的研究结果验证了石油价格冲击对新兴股票市场的风险溢出效应,以及上行风险和下行风险之间的不对称影响。这些发现对投资者,投资组合经理和市场交易者具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号