首页> 外文会议>System Sciences, HICSS, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on >Comparing Capacity Market and Payment Designs for Ensuring Supply Adequacy
【24h】

Comparing Capacity Market and Payment Designs for Ensuring Supply Adequacy

机译:比较产能市场和支付设计以确保供应充足

获取原文

摘要

Capacity payments and capacity markets are one mechanism for ensuring that sufficient marginal generation is built to meet peak demands with an adequate reserve margin. The European Union experience with such mechanisms has focused on capacity payment mechanisms, while in the United States the trend has been towards quantity-based mechanisms, especially in the form of locationally-specific, centralized procurement auctions on a forward basis, with the grid operator securing capacity commitments three or four years ahead and allocating costs based on realized peak load. Historically, many of the European and U.S. capacity market designs have been generally ineffectual. Recent American designs have evolved towards contractual mechanisms that guarantee adequate generation investment but at potentially higher costs.
机译:容量支付和容量市场是一种机制,用于确保建立足够的边际发电量来满足高峰需求并具有足够的储备余量。欧洲联盟在此类机制方面的经验集中于容量支付机制,而在美国,趋势已朝着基于数量的机制发展,特别是以与电网运营商预先定位的特定位置,集中采购拍卖的形式确保提前三到四年完成容量承诺,并根据已实现的高峰负荷分配成本。从历史上看,许多欧洲和美国的容量市场设计通常都是无效的。最近的美国设计已经朝着合同机制发展,该机制可以保证足够的发电投资,但成本可能更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号