首页> 外文会议>AIAA SciTech forum and exposition >Shock-Shock Interaction over a Hemisphere in Hypersonic Flow - Part Ⅱ
【24h】

Shock-Shock Interaction over a Hemisphere in Hypersonic Flow - Part Ⅱ

机译:高超音速流中半球的激波相互作用-第二部分

获取原文

摘要

The interaction of an oblique shock wave with a bow shock in front of a hemisphere at Mach 14.6 is simulated. The configuration corresponds to an experiment performed at the Calspan University of Buffalo Research Center (CUBRC). Several simulations are required due to uncertainty in the exact location of the incident oblique shock wave with the criterion to match the location of the computed and experimental peak surface pressure and heat transfer. In our previous paper (Kianvashrad, N. and Knight, D., AIAA Paper No. 2019-0890, SCITECH 2019) two simulations were presented with different incident shock locations. One of the simulations showed statistically stationary (periodic) behavior in the surface pressure and heat transfer, but the location of the computed peak surface pressure and heat transfer differed from experiment by three degrees on the surface of the hemisphere. A second computation with different incident shock location showed close agreement between the locations of the computed and experiment peak surface pressure and heat transfer; however, the computation was not yet statistically stationary. The objectives of this paper are to examine results of the second incident shock location, and to evaluate additional numerical issues associated therein including temporal accuracy and the number of inner iterations used for temporal integration. The careful examination of the results shows a turbulent flow for the second case while the first case is unsteady laminar flow.
机译:模拟了斜冲击波与半球前面的马赫数为14.6时的弓形冲击的相互作用。该配置对应于在布法罗的卡尔斯潘大学研究中心(CUBRC)进行的实验。由于入射斜激波的确切位置存在不确定性,因此需要进行一些模拟,并采用与计算出的峰值表面压力和实验峰值表面压力及热传递的位置相匹配的准则。在我们之前的论文中(北卡罗来纳州肯瓦什拉德和北卡罗莱纳州AIAA论文编号2019-0890,SCITECH 2019),提出了两种模拟方法,它们具有不同的入射冲击位置。其中一项仿真显示了表面压力和热传递的统计静态(周期性)行为,但计算出的峰值表面压力和热传递的位置与实验在半球表面上相差了3度。带有不同入射冲击位置的第二次计算表明,计算出的峰值和实验峰值表面压力与传热的位置之间有着紧密的一致性。但是,该计算在统计上还不是平稳的。本文的目的是检查第二次冲击位置的结果,并评估与之相关的其他数值问题,包括时间精度和用于时间积分的内部迭代次数。对结果的仔细检查显示,第二种情况是湍流,而第一种情况是不稳定的层流。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号