首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Smart Power System and Sustainable Energy >Comparison of Classifiers for Power Quality Disturbances with Wavelet Statistical Analysis
【24h】

Comparison of Classifiers for Power Quality Disturbances with Wavelet Statistical Analysis

机译:电能质量扰动分类器与小波统计分析的比较

获取原文

摘要

In this paper, an attempt is made to compare the Power Quality (PQ) recognition accuracy with efficient features. Initially, a few of the reliable statistical parameters such as the mean, standard deviation, Root Mean Square (RMS), form factor, crest factor, Shannon entropy, log entropy, normalized entropy, skewness, and kurtosis of eight synthetically generated PQ disturbances and the pure tone signal are computed. These statistical parameters are simple to compute and are of low-dimension. A host of classification techniques such as the K-nearest Neighbor (KNN), Discriminant Analysis (DA), Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes' (NB), and Random Forest (RF) have been put to test for performance appraisal to determine the discriminating ability of these parameters. Further, the applicability of multi-resolution Wavelet Transform (WT) has been explored to extract these chosen statistical parameters in the WT domain for a possible enhancement in recognition accuracy. The result shows, the RF remains the slowest with the highest accuracy while the performance of the DA remains the poorest. The WT has outperformed the baseline method of statistical analysis as revealed from our results. However, the KNN tends to provide the highest classification accuracy among all others for low feature dimension whereas the speed of response of DT has been fastest.
机译:本文尝试将电能质量(PQ)识别精度与有效功能进行比较。最初,一些可靠的统计参数,例如八个合成生成的PQ扰动的均值,标准差,均方根(RMS),形状因数,波峰因数,香农熵,对数熵,归一化熵,偏度和峰度,计算纯音信号。这些统计参数易于计算且维数较低。许多分类技术,例如K最近邻(KNN),判别分析(DA),决策树(DT),支持向量机(SVM),朴素贝叶斯(NB)和随机森林(RF),进行性能评估测试以确定这些参数的区分能力。此外,已经探索了多分辨率小波变换(WT)的适用性,以提取WT域中的这些选定统计参数,从而可能提高识别精度。结果表明,RF保持最慢,精度最高,而DA的性能仍然最差。从我们的结果可以看出,WT的性能优于统计分析的基准方法。但是,对于低特征维,KNN倾向于提供最高的分类精度,而DT的响应速度最快。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号