首页> 外文会议>IEEE Petroleum and Chemical Industry Committee Conference >AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO HAZARDOUS AREA CLASSIFICATION - THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D) MODELING OF HAZARDOUS AREAS
【24h】

AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO HAZARDOUS AREA CLASSIFICATION - THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D) MODELING OF HAZARDOUS AREAS

机译:危险区域分类的一种创新方法 - 危险区域三维(3D)建模

获取原文

摘要

This paper establishes an innovative approach to represent hazardous areas as true volumes in a plant 3D model and demonstrate increased safety. Examples from an Australian project have been used to compare the classical 2D vs innovative 3D approach. The 2D approach relies on plan and elevation drawings to show the hazardous areas from various sources of flammable release. Whereas, the 3D approach utilizes data rich 3D models used for the design of petrochemical plants. Industry standards (IEC, AS/NZS) require identification of all sources of release including piping (vents, flanges, etc.), identification of Electrical Equipment in Hazardous Areas (EEHA), preparation of Hazardous Area Verification Dossier (HAVD) and completion of detailed inspections. Such requirements may get adopted in North America as evidenced with the acceptance of IEC standards in Canada and Gulf of Mexico Offshore facilities [2][3]. The 3D approach automates the generation of EEHA list vs the error-prone manual identification using 2D layouts. The 3D approach allows capturing hazardous areas from piping sources, whereas, the 2D approach generally uses a note referencing a typical detail from a standard. The 2D approach requires man hour intensive physical walk downs and remedy of non-compliances during the construction phase. However, the 3D approach allows performing virtual walk downs of the facility to mitigate non-compliances during the detailed design phase, thus preventing schedule delays, design rework and replacement of equipment. The 3D approach presented sets an effective methodology for hazardous area classification thereby delivering safer petrochemical installations.
机译:本文建立了一种创新的方法,代表危险区域在植物3D模型中的真实体积,并表现出增加的安全性。澳大利亚项目的示例已被用于比较古典2D与创新的3D方法。 2D方法依赖于计划和高程图,以显示来自各种易燃释放来源的危险区域。虽然,3D方法利用了用于石化植物的设计的数据丰富的3D模型。行业标准(IEC,AS / NZS)需要识别所有释放来源,包括管道(通风口,法兰等),识别危险区域(EEHA)的电气设备,危险区域验证档案(HAVD)和完成详细检查。这些要求可能会在北美采用,可见,在加拿大和墨西哥海湾的可爱标准的接受情况下证明了墨西哥海上设施[2] [3]。 3D方法自动化EEHA列表的生成与使用2D布局的错误易于手动识别。 3D方法允许从管道源捕获危险区域,而2D方法通常使用从标准中引用典型细节的音符。 2D方法需要人小时密集的物理步行,在施工阶段期间不合格地缩小和补救。然而,3D方法允许在详细设计阶段执行虚拟步行以减轻非协商,从而防止调度延迟,设计返工和设备更换。 3D方法呈现了危险区域分类的有效方法,从而提供更安全的石化装置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号