首页> 外文会议>ASME Power Conference >BEST PRACTICES FOR COGENERATION SYSTEM DESIGN
【24h】

BEST PRACTICES FOR COGENERATION SYSTEM DESIGN

机译:热电联产系统设计的最佳实践

获取原文

摘要

Successful cogeneration system design requires a combination of engineering, investigation, and forecasting skills. Operating schedules for the facility must be considered in the design of the cogeneration system to optimize overall plant utilization and economics. This results in tradeoffs between electrical power production and thermal heat recovery for many applications of the technology. Optimizing these two parameters requires a thorough understanding of how and when the facility uses power and heat and the owner's objectives of the investment in the cogeneration system. Customer-sited cogeneration systems have been accepted as one option to mitigate electrical supply shortages. On the utility side, this requires that cogeneration systems operate at a relatively high capacity factor, especially during peak periods. On the customer side, the cogeneration system must be capable of meeting onsite energy needs to reduce energy costs. In California, the Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) provides incentives for the installation of distributed generation systems. Incentives are paid on an installed capacity basis (USD/kW) that varies by installed technology. Eligible technologies include photovoltaic, wind, fuel cells, internal combustion engines, and microturbines. Alternative Energy Systems Consulting, Inc. (AESC) provides technical support services to the SGIP, the sponsoring utilities and SGIP's Working Group. The services that AESC provides varies with utility, but primarily includes program design support, regulatory review, technology evaluation, application review, generator performance metering, participant training and equipment field verification. Itron evaluates the SGIP to quantify performance of the systems and estimate overall impacts of the program. This paper will present best practice recommendations for cogeneration system design to meet the efficiency criteria of the SGIP. Recommendations are based on findings from numerous AESC performance reviews and on-site inspections, as well as results of Itron's in-depth performance evaluation of the effectiveness of useful thermal energy recovery of on-site cogeneration systems receiving incentives from the SGIP. Information is presented through Program Year 2005. Results of several past studies have suggested that cogeneration systems were not operating as they were designed and, more importantly, were not achieving the efficiencies claimed at the design stage. This paper will also explore some of the key drivers behind the unexpectedly low thermal energy recovery and overall plant performance sampled from the fleet of SGIP cogenerators. Results from recent Itron studies will be combined with AESC's expertise in actual operations to develop a list of best practices to be followed when designing and commissioning a cogeneration system.
机译:成功的热电联产系统设计需要工程,调查和预测技能的组合。必须考虑设施的操作时间表,以便在热电联产系统设计中,以优化整体植物利用和经济学。这导致电力生产和热热回收之间的权衡,以了解该技术的许多应用。优化这两个参数需要彻底了解设施如何以及当设施使用权力和热量以及所有者对热电联产系统投资的目标。客户坐的热电联产系统被认为是减轻电源短缺的一种选择。在实用程序方面,这要求热电联产系统在相对高的容量因子下操作,特别是在高峰期期间。在客户方面,热电联产系统必须能够满足现场能源,需要降低能源成本。在加利福尼亚州,自发电激励计划(SGIP)为安装分布式发电系统提供了激励。激励措施由已安装的能力基础(USD / kW)支付,该技术因已安装技术而异。符合条件的技术包括光伏,风,燃料电池,内燃发动机和微观障碍。替代能源系统咨询公司(AESC)为SGIP,赞助公用事业和SGIP的工作组提供技术支持服务。 AESC提供的服务随着实用程序而变化,但主要包括程序设计支持,监管审查,技术评估,应用审查,发电机性能计量,参与者培训和设备现场验证。 Itron评估SGIP以量化系统的性能并估算程序的整体影响。本文将为热电联产系统设计提供最佳实践建议,以满足SGIP的效率标准。建议基于来自众多AESC性能评价和现场检查的调查结果,以及ITROR的深入性能评估,对来自SGIP的有用热能回收的有效性的有效性评估的结果。信息通过2005年的计划提出。若干过去研究的结果表明,随着它们的设计,更重要的是,热电联产权没有运作,更重要的是,没有实现设计阶段的效率。本文还将探讨出乎意料的低热能回收和从SGIP促进队的舰队中采样的整体植物性能背后的一些关键驱动因素。最近的ITROR研究结果将与AESC在实际操作中的专业知识结合在设计和调试热电联产系统时制定最佳实践列表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号