【24h】

BEST PRACTICES FOR COGENERATION SYSTEM DESIGN

机译:发电系统设计的最佳实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Successful cogeneration system design requires a combination of engineering, investigation, and forecasting skills. Operating schedules for the facility must be considered in the design of the cogeneration system to optimize overall plant utilization and economics. This results in tradeoffs between electrical power production and thermal heat recovery for many applications of the technology. Optimizing these two parameters requires a thorough understanding of how and when the facility uses power and heat and the owner's objectives of the investment in the cogeneration system. Customer-sited cogeneration systems have been accepted as one option to mitigate electrical supply shortages. On the utility side, this requires that cogeneration systems operate at a relatively high capacity factor, especially during peak periods. On the customer side, the cogeneration system must be capable of meeting onsite energy needs to reduce energy costs. In California, the Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) provides incentives for the installation of distributed generation systems. Incentives are paid on an installed capacity basis ($/kW) that varies by installed technology. Eligible technologies include photovoltaic, wind, fuel cells, internal combustion engines, and microturbines. Alternative Energy Systems Consulting, Inc. (AESC) provides technical support services to the SGIP, the sponsoring utilities and SGIP's Working Group. The services that AESC provides varics with utility, but primarily includes program design support, regulatory review, technology evaluation, application review, generator performance metering, participant training and equipment field verification. Itron evaluates the SGIP to quantify performance of the systems and estimate overall impacts of the program. This paper will present best practice recommendations for cogeneration system design to meet the efficiency criteria of the SGIP. Recommendations are based on findings from numerous AESC performance reviews and on-site inspections, as well as results of Itron's in-depth performance evaluation of the effectiveness of useful thermal energy recovery of on-site cogeneration systems receiving incentives from the SGIP. Information is presented through Program Year 2005. Results of several past studies have suggested that cogeneration systems were not operating as they were designed and, more importantly, were not achieving the efficiencies claimed at the design stage. This paper will also explore some of the key drivers behind the unexpectedly low thermal energy recovery and overall plant performance sampled from the fleet of SGIP cogenerators. Results from recent Itron studies will be combined with AESC's expertise in actual operations to develop a list of best practices to be followed when designing and commissioning a cogeneration system.
机译:成功的热电联产系统设计需要工程,调查和预测技能的结合。在热电联产系统的设计中必须考虑设施的运行时间表,以优化工厂的整体利用率和经济性。对于该技术的许多应用,这导致了电力生产和热能回收之间的权衡。优化这两个参数需要透彻了解设施如何以及何时使用电力和热量,以及业主对热电联产系统投资的目标。客户所在地的热电联产系统已被视为缓解电力供应短缺的一种选择。在公用事业方面,这要求热电联产系统以相对较高的容量系数运行,尤其是在高峰时段。在客户方面,热电联产系统必须能够满足现场能源需求,以降低能源成本。在加利福尼亚州,自发电激励计划(SGIP)为安装分布式发电系统提供了激励措施。奖励是根据安装的容量(美元/千瓦)支付的,具体取决于安装的技术。合格的技术包括光伏,风能,燃料电池,内燃机和微型涡轮机。 Alternative Energy Systems Consulting,Inc.(AESC)为SGIP,发起公用事业和SGIP工作组提供技术支持服务。 AESC为varics提供实用程序,但主要包括程序设计支持,法规审查,技术评估,应用程序审查,发电机性能计量,参与者培训和设备现场验证。 Itron评估SGIP,以量化系统性能并评估该计划的总体影响。本文将提出热电联产系统设计的最佳实践建议,以满足SGIP的效率标准。这些建议是基于众多AESC性能评估和现场检查的结果,以及Itron对受到SGIP奖励的现场热电联产系统有效热能回收的有效性进行深入性能评估的结果。信息通过2005年计划年度提供。过去的几项研究结果表明,热电联产系统未按设计运行,更重要的是,未达到设计阶段要求的效率。本文还将探讨从SGIP热电联产机组采样到的低热能回收率和​​工厂整体性能背后的一些关键驱动因素。 Itron最近的研究结果将与AESC在实际操作中的专业知识相结合,以制定出一系列设计和调试热电联产系统时要遵循的最佳实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号