首页> 外文会议>IEEE Petroleum and Chemical Industry Technical Conference >Active Harmonic Mitigation - What the Manufacturers don't tell you: Copyright Material IEEE, Paper No. PCIC-2018-43
【24h】

Active Harmonic Mitigation - What the Manufacturers don't tell you: Copyright Material IEEE, Paper No. PCIC-2018-43

机译:主动谐波缓解 - 制造商没有告诉您:版权材料IEEE,文件编号PCIC-2018-43

获取原文

摘要

Despite their high cost, active harmonic mitigation solutions, such as parallel Active Power Filters (APFs) and Active Front End Drives (AFEs), are growing in popularity. As the latest technology, they are being touted as a better choice than the various forms of passive harmonic mitigation solutions presently available. Is this actually the case? Active solutions incorporate switching strategies using IGBTs in order to make the current drawn by the adjustable speed drive, or other nonlinear load, more sinusoidal. What you will rarely hear from manufacturers is that this switching introduces higher frequency harmonics, normally above the 50th. When measurements are taken up to the 50th. current total harmonic distortion (ITHD) is often quite low but when measured up to the 100th or higher, ITHD almost always exceeds their claimed performance levels which consider only harmonics up to the 50th. This is certainly a concern because higher frequency harmonics are more likely to cause power system problems and issues with other connected loads, than the lower frequency harmonics that they are designed to reduce. Although there are IEEE and IEC industry standards that restrict levels of harmonics in the low frequency and very high frequency ranges, there are no standards presently that address the range between 2 kHz and 150 kHz. Manufacturers therefore, often design active harmonic mitigation equipment that generates relatively high levels of these mid-range frequencies, particularly since switching frequencies of IGBTs typically fall precisely within this range.
机译:尽管它们的高成本高,所以主动谐波缓解解决方案,如并行有源电力滤波器(APFS)和主动前端驱动器(AFES)越来越受欢迎。作为最新技术,他们被吹捧为比目前可用的各种形式的被动谐波缓解解决方案更好的选择。这实际上是这种情况吗?活性解决方案采用了使用IGBT的切换策略,以使电流由可调速度驱动器或其他非线性载荷,更正弦绘制。您很少听到制造商的声明是,这种交换机推出了更高的频率谐波,通常高于50 th 。当测量到50时 th 。目前的总谐波失真(ITHD)通常非常低,但在测量到100时 th 或更高的,伊尔德几乎总是超过他们所要求保护的性能水平,只考虑谐波到50 th 。这肯定是一个问题,因为更高的频率谐波更有可能导致电力系统问题和其他连接负载的问题,而不是它们设计用于减少的较低频率谐波。虽然有IEEE和IEC行业标准,但在低频和非常高频范围内限制了谐波的水平,目前没有标准的标准解决了2 kHz和150 kHz之间的范围。因此,制造商通常设计有源谐波缓解设备,其产生相对高水平的这些中档频率,特别是由于IGBT的开关频率通常精确地在该范围内下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号