首页> 外文会议>IEEE Petroleum and Chemical Industry Technical Conference >Active Harmonic Mitigation - What the Manufacturers don't tell you: Copyright Material IEEE, Paper No. PCIC-2018-43
【24h】

Active Harmonic Mitigation - What the Manufacturers don't tell you: Copyright Material IEEE, Paper No. PCIC-2018-43

机译:主动谐波抑制-制造商不告诉您的内容:版权材料IEEE,论文编号PCIC-2018-43

获取原文

摘要

Despite their high cost, active harmonic mitigation solutions, such as parallel Active Power Filters (APFs) and Active Front End Drives (AFEs), are growing in popularity. As the latest technology, they are being touted as a better choice than the various forms of passive harmonic mitigation solutions presently available. Is this actually the case? Active solutions incorporate switching strategies using IGBTs in order to make the current drawn by the adjustable speed drive, or other nonlinear load, more sinusoidal. What you will rarely hear from manufacturers is that this switching introduces higher frequency harmonics, normally above the 50th. When measurements are taken up to the 50th. current total harmonic distortion (ITHD) is often quite low but when measured up to the 100th or higher, ITHD almost always exceeds their claimed performance levels which consider only harmonics up to the 50th. This is certainly a concern because higher frequency harmonics are more likely to cause power system problems and issues with other connected loads, than the lower frequency harmonics that they are designed to reduce. Although there are IEEE and IEC industry standards that restrict levels of harmonics in the low frequency and very high frequency ranges, there are no standards presently that address the range between 2 kHz and 150 kHz. Manufacturers therefore, often design active harmonic mitigation equipment that generates relatively high levels of these mid-range frequencies, particularly since switching frequencies of IGBTs typically fall precisely within this range.
机译:尽管成本高昂,但有源谐波抑制解决方案(例如并行有源功率滤波器(APF)和有源前端驱动器(AFE))越来越受欢迎。作为最新技术,与目前可用的各种形式的无源谐波抑制解决方案相比,它们被誉为更好的选择。真的是这样吗?有源解决方案采用了采用IGBT的开关策略,以使可调速驱动器或其他非线性负载吸收的电流更加正弦波。您几乎不会从制造商那里听到的是,这种开关会引入更高频率的谐波,通常高于50 。最多进行50次测量时 。当前的总谐波失真(ITHD)通常很低,但是测量到100 甚至更高,ITHD几乎总是超过其声称的性能水平,该性能水平仅考虑高达50的谐波 。这无疑是一个令人担忧的问题,因为与设计用来降低谐波的低频谐波相比,更高频率的谐波更容易引起电力系统问题和其他连接负载的问题。尽管有IEEE和IEC工业标准限制了低频和非常高频率范围内的谐波电平,但是目前尚无任何标准可解决2 kHz至150 kHz之间的范围。因此,制造商通常会设计有源谐波消除设备,这些设备会产生相对较高水平的这些中档频率,特别是因为IGBT的开关频率通常恰好落在该范围内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号