首页> 外文会议>IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing >No half-measures: A study of manual and tool-assisted end-user programming tasks in Excel
【24h】

No half-measures: A study of manual and tool-assisted end-user programming tasks in Excel

机译:绝无半招:在Excel中研究手动和工具辅助的最终用户编程任务

获取原文

摘要

The popularity of end-user programming has lead to diverse end-user development environments. Despite accurate and efficient tools available in such environments, end-user programmers often manually complete tasks. What are the consequences of rejecting these tools? In this paper, we answer this question by studying end-user programmers completing four tasks with and without tools. In analyzing 111 solutions to each of these tasks, we observe that neither tool use nor tool rejection was consistently more accurate or efficient. In some cases, tool users took nearly twice as long to solve problems and over-relied on tools, causing errors in 95% of solutions. Compared to manual task completion, the primary benefit of tool use was narrowing the kinds of errors that users made. We also observed that partial tool use can be worse than no tool use at all.
机译:最终用户编程的流行导致了各种各样的最终用户开发环境。尽管在此类环境中可以使用准确而有效的工具,但最终用户程序员通常还是手动完成任务。拒绝使用这些工具会有什么后果?在本文中,我们通过研究使用和不使用工具完成四个任务的最终用户程序员来回答这个问题。在分析这些任务中的每一个的111个解决方案时,我们观察到工具使用和工具拒绝都不总是一贯更准确或更有效。在某些情况下,工具用户花费了将近两倍的时间来解决问题,并且过度依赖工具,从而导致95%的解决方案出现错误。与手动完成任务相比,使用工具的主要好处是缩小了用户所犯错误的种类。我们还观察到部分工具的使用可能比完全不使用工具要糟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号