首页> 外文会议>Conference on photomask technology >Mask process correction method comparison and study: CD-SEM box versus standard correction method
【24h】

Mask process correction method comparison and study: CD-SEM box versus standard correction method

机译:掩模工艺校正方法比较和研究:CD-SEM盒与标准校正方法

获取原文

摘要

With continuous shrinking technology nodes, the error tolerances for mask CD (critical dimension) becomes tighter and tighter since mask errors are passed on downstream and might even be amplified at wafer level. Therefore, high accuracy MPC (Mask Process Correction) models are imperative. Besides the mask model, the MPC algorithm for the input layout also has a critical influence on mask quality. This paper studies and compares two methods of MPC correction: a new method, introducing a correction algorithm based on the CD-SEM box is compared to the standard method that measures EPE (edge placement error) only at the center of an edge. Under which condition the EPE measurement method for MPC correction by the CD-SEM box method should be applied is discussed and its influence on the correction accuracy of small CD patterns is demonstrated.
机译:随着工艺技术节点的不断缩小,掩模CD(关键尺寸)的误差容限变得越来越严格,因为掩模误差在下游传递,甚至可能在晶圆级被放大。因此,高精度MPC(面膜处理校正)模型势在必行。除了遮罩模型之外,用于输入布局的MPC算法对遮罩质量也有至关重要的影响。本文研究并比较了两种MPC校正方法:一种新方法,该方法介绍了一种基于CD-SEM框的校正算法,该方法与仅在边缘中心测量EPE(边缘放置误差)的标准方法进行了比较。讨论了在哪种条件下应采用CD-SEM盒法进行MPC校正的EPE测量方法,并论证了其对小CD图案校正精度的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号