首页> 外文会议>IEEE Aerospace Conference >Seeking advice from experts: A cautionary tale
【24h】

Seeking advice from experts: A cautionary tale

机译:寻求专家的建议:一个警示故事

获取原文

摘要

Experts are considered assets for most projects. Expert judgment is widely used in almost all major processes in the “Project Management Book of Knowledge 5th edition” [1], and for some of the processes it is the only technique mentioned. Most project teams will have their own internal experts, but many teams will seek outside expertise from project consultants, user groups, subject matter experts, or senior management people. The ultimate outcome of the process, usually the decision quality, will depend critically on whether the prospective advisor should or should not provide advice based on his or her knowledge of the problem area. There is a significant amount of research that examines why or when a decision maker will or will not use an advisor's advice [2,3]. This paper examines the other side of the relationship - why and when an advisor will agree to provide advice and identifies moderators that influence an advisor's willingness to give advice.
机译:专家被认为是大多数项目的资产。专家判断在“项目管理知识手册第5版” [1]中的几乎所有主要过程中均得到广泛使用,对于某些过程,这是唯一提到的技术。大多数项目团队将拥有自己的内部专家,但是许多团队将从项目顾问,用户组,主题专家或高级管理人员那里寻求外部专业知识。该过程的最终结果,通常是决策质量,将在很大程度上取决于准顾问是否应该基于他或她对问题领域的了解而提供建议。有大量研究调查了决策者为何或何时会使用或不使用顾问的建议[2,3]。本文研究了这种关系的另一面-为何以及何时顾问同意提供建议,并确定了影响顾问意愿的主持人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号