首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping conference >LOCATION OF INITIATION SITES IN FRACTURE TOUGHNESS TESTING SPECIMENS - THE EFFECT OF SIZE AND SIDE GROOVES
【24h】

LOCATION OF INITIATION SITES IN FRACTURE TOUGHNESS TESTING SPECIMENS - THE EFFECT OF SIZE AND SIDE GROOVES

机译:断裂韧度测试标本中起始位点的位置-尺寸和侧面沟槽的影响

获取原文

摘要

Cleavage fracture initiates usually at single locations in front of the fatigue crack in some position along the crack front. If the crack driving force along the crack front is uniform, one should expect the initiation sites to be randomly located along the crack front. Finite element analyses have, however, shown that the crack driving force varies along the crack front. Thus, the location of the cleavage initiation sites should reflect this variation in crack driving force. Fracture toughness specimens differ both in geometry and size. Also, the specimens may be side grooved or plane sided. All this can be expected to affect the local crack driving force along the crack front. The local crack driving force for cleavage fracture initiation can be divided into two components. The local K_J value describes the local effective stress intensity, whereas Q or T_(stress) describes the local constraint. To make things even more complicated, the local constraint is also affected by the local effective stress intensity. All of these are also affected by any ductile tearing occurring prior to cleavage initiation. The testing standards contain specific limitations on specimen sizes and their measuring capacity in order to ensure that the crack driving force in different specimens is sufficiently similar to make the results from different specimen types and sizes comparable. Classically, the fracture toughness test specimens have been comparatively large. Recently more and more work has been devoted to diminish the size of the specimens, to save material. One very promising specimen type is the miniature C(T) specimen with a 4 mm thickness and total height of 10 mm. Based on a recent international round-robin, the miniature C(T) specimen appears to provide compatible Master Curve T_0 values as large specimens, but further validation regarding the similitude of the cleavage initiation is required, since the Master Curve is based on the assumption that specimen size does not affect this similitude. In this work, the location of cleavage initiation sites along the crack front are examined for different size and type of fracture toughness specimens, focusing on the miniature C(T) specimen. The location distributions are evaluated in terms of load level, specimen type, size and possible side grooving. It is shown that, as long as the standard requirements are fulfilled, the initiation location distributions for the miniature C(T) specimens are similar to larger conventional specimens. Side grooving is shown to have a minor effect on the initiator locations.
机译:劈裂断裂通常在疲劳裂纹前面的单个位置处沿裂纹前沿的某个位置引发。如果沿裂纹前沿的裂纹驱动力是均匀的,则应期望起始位置沿裂纹前沿随机分布。但是,有限元分析表明,裂纹驱动力沿裂纹前沿变化。因此,解理起始位点的位置应反映裂纹驱动力的这种变化。断裂韧性试样的几何形状和尺寸均不同。而且,样品可以在侧面开槽或在平面上。可以预期所有这些都会影响沿裂纹前沿的局部裂纹驱动力。用于解理断裂起始的局部裂纹驱动力可分为两个分量。局部K_J值描述了局部有效应力强度,而Q或T_(stress)描述了局部约束。更复杂的是,局部约束还受到局部有效应力强度的影响。所有这些还受到在分裂开始之前发生的任何韧性撕裂的影响。测试标准对样本尺寸及其测量能力有特定限制,以确保不同样本中的裂纹驱动力足够相似,以使不同样本类型和大小的结果具有可比性。传统上,断裂韧性测试样品相对较大。近来,越来越多的工作致力于减小样品的尺寸,以节省材料。一种非常有前途的标本类型是厚度为4 mm,总高度为10 mm的微型C(T)标本。基于最近的国际循环法,微型C(T)标本似乎可以提供与大型标本兼容的主曲线T_0值,但由于主曲线是基于假设的,因此需要进一步验证裂解起始的相似性样本大小不会影响此相似度。在这项工作中,针对不同尺寸和类型的断裂韧性标本,研究了沿着裂纹前沿的劈裂起始点的位置,重点是微型C(T)标本。根据载荷水平,试样类型,尺寸和可能的侧面开槽来评估位置分布。结果表明,只要满足标准要求,微型C(T)样品的起始位置分布就与较大的常规样品相似。侧面开槽显示对引发剂位置影响较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号