首页> 外文会议>IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium >Optimizing channel selection for seizure detection
【24h】

Optimizing channel selection for seizure detection

机译:优化癫痫发作检测的通道选择

获取原文

摘要

Interpretation of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals can be complicated by obfuscating artifacts. Artifact detection plays an important role in the observation and analysis of EEG signals. Spatial information contained in the placement of the electrodes can be exploited to accurately detect artifacts. However, when fewer electrodes are used, less spatial information is available, making it harder to detect artifacts. In this study, we investigate the performance of a deep learning algorithm, CNN-LSTM, on several channel configurations. Each configuration was designed to minimize the amount of spatial information lost compared to a standard 22-channel EEG. Systems using a reduced number of channels ranging from 8 to 20 achieved sensitivities between 33% and 37% with false alarms in the range of [38, 50] per 24 hours. False alarms increased dramatically (e.g., over 300 per 24 hours) when the number of channels was further reduced. Baseline performance of a system that used all 22 channels was 39% sensitivity with 23 false alarms. Since the 22-channel system was the only system that included referential channels, the rapid increase in the false alarm rate as the number of channels was reduced underscores the importance of retaining referential channels for artifact reduction. This cautionary result is important because one of the biggest differences between various types of EEGs administered is the type of referential channel used.
机译:混淆伪影可能会使脑电图(EEG)信号的解释变得复杂。伪影检测在脑电信号的观察和分析中起着重要作用。可以利用电极放置中包含的空间信息来准确检测伪像。然而,当使用更少的电极时,更少的空间信息可用,这使得更难检测伪像。在这项研究中,我们研究了深度学习算法CNN-LSTM在几种通道配置上的性能。与标准的22通道EEG相比,每种配置都旨在最大程度地减少丢失的空间信息量。使用数量减少至8至20的通道的系统可实现的敏感度在33%至37%之间,每24小时的错误警报范围为[38,50]。当通道数量进一步减少时,虚假警报急剧增加(例如,每24小时超过300个)。使用所有22个通道的系统的基准性能为39%的灵敏度和23个错误警报。由于22通道系统是唯一包含参考通道的系统,因此随着通道数量的减少,误报率的迅速提高突显了保留参考通道以减少伪影的重要性。此警告结果非常重要,因为所管理的各种类型的EEG之间最大的区别之一是所使用的参考渠道的类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号