首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques >Comparison of two approaches for land cover classification from ICESat/GLAS waveform data
【24h】

Comparison of two approaches for land cover classification from ICESat/GLAS waveform data

机译:从ICESat / GLAS波形数据比较两种土地覆盖分类方法

获取原文

摘要

The Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite/Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (ICESat/GLAS) as a full-waveform satellite LiDAR enables land cover classification estimation. Although it has already been retired, its successor satellites will provide valuable information in climate change and icecap glaciology studies. In order to study the way of waveform-based land cover classification using machine learning methods, we utilized decision tree (DT) and Gaussian process (GP) methods to analyze the accuracy of land cover classification. DT classification is a convenient and practical method used in previous reports. GP classification can provide the state-of-the-art recognition performance using an elegant Bayesian framework. To generate the true labels of machine learning classifiers, a solution of the time-matching and location-matching between ICESat/GLAS laser footprints and LANDSAT images has been achieved. Plenty of experiments have been implemented in the Jakobshavn Glacier by evaluating classifiers features selection, training data ratio and classification confusion matrix. Experimental results show that the overall accuracy of the GP classification is solidly higher than DT classification but GP classification consumes more time. At the best training data ratio of 70%, GP classification accuracy is 92.22% which is higher than DT classification accuracy of 87.78%.
机译:冰,云和陆地高程卫星/地球科学激光测高仪系统(ICESat / GLAS)作为全波形卫星LiDAR可以进行土地覆盖分类估算。尽管它已经退役,但其后继卫星将在气候变化和冰盖冰川学研究中提供有价值的信息。为了研究使用机器学习方法进行基于波形的土地覆盖分类的方法,我们利用决策树(DT)和高斯过程(GP)方法来分析土地覆盖分类的准确性。 DT分类是先前报告中使用的一种方便实用的方法。 GP分类可以使用优雅的贝叶斯框架提供最新的识别性能。为了生成机器学习分类器的真实标签,已经实现了ICESat / GLAS激光足迹与LANDSAT图像之间时间匹配和位置匹配的解决方案。通过评估分类器的特征选择,训练数据比率和分类混淆矩阵,在雅各布港冰川中已进行了大量实验。实验结果表明,GP分类的总体准确度明显高于DT分类,但GP分类会花费更多时间。在最佳训练数据比率为70%时,GP分类精度为92.22%,高于DT分类精度为87.78%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号