首页> 外文会议>Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology >Comparative Analysis of Idea Generating Processes in Emerging and Developed Countries; Indonesia, Malaysia, and Japan
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Idea Generating Processes in Emerging and Developed Countries; Indonesia, Malaysia, and Japan

机译:新兴国家与发达国家思想产生过程的比较分析;印度尼西亚,马来西亚和日本

获取原文

摘要

In recent years, researchers have focused on innovations launched from emerging countries. Although several cases of innovative products developed in emerging countries have been reported, there are few studies investigating differences in the idea generating process in emerging and developed countries. The main purpose of this study is to investigate those differences by adopting an exploratory approach pursued through a series of idea generation experiments. The experiments were conducted using as subjects graduate school students in two emerging countries, Indonesia and Malaysia, and one developed county, Japan. To simulate a realistic new product development process, the experiment consisted of three parts: the participants developing ideas, experts evaluating the ideas, and then participants analyzing the process over several group discussions so that the points may be discerned in the development process where there are differences between emerging countries and developed countries. Differences on both idea characteristics and selection criteria were found. First, the Indonesian and Malaysian participants proposed feasible ideas having lower investment risk than did Japanese participants. Second, the participants from the two emerging countries selected ideas with greater confidence than did the Japanese participants. Third, the former groups made decisions on their ideas without referring to experts' evaluations in contrast to the latter group.
机译:近年来,研究人员专注于新兴国家发起的创新。尽管已经报道了在新兴国家开发的一些创新产品的案例,但是很少有研究调查在新兴国家和发达国家中创意产生过程的差异的研究。本研究的主要目的是通过采取一系列想法产生实验所采用的探索性方法来研究这些差异。实验是使用印度尼西亚和马来西亚这两个新兴国家和日本一个发达县的研究生作为研究对象进行的。为了模拟现实的新产品开发过程,该实验包括三个部分:参与者开发想法,专家评估想法,然后参与者通过几次小组讨论对过程进行分析,以便可以在开发过程中辨别要点。新兴国家与发达国家之间的差异。发现在思想特征和选择标准上都存在差异。首先,印尼和马来西亚参与者提出了可行的想法,其投资风险低于日本参与者。其次,来自两个新兴国家的参与者比日本参与者更有信心地选择了想法。第三,与后一组相反,前一组在不参考专家评估的情况下就他们的想法做出决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号