首页> 外文会议>eceee summer study on energy efficiency >Childhood and energy efficiency issues at school and at home: the role of information, teaching, upbringing and infrastructures
【24h】

Childhood and energy efficiency issues at school and at home: the role of information, teaching, upbringing and infrastructures

机译:学校和家庭中的童年和能源效率问题:信息,教学,培养和基础设施的作用

获取原文

摘要

Might children be the solution to environmental and energy problems? Nowadays they are under considerable pressure to become ambassadors for energy moderation in different areas of life, learning about these issues at school and receiving recommendations from children’s newspapers and TV programmes. Yet to put children at the “heart” of this system is to forget that they have little agency and that their learning process is essentially based on adults who are stakeholders in their education. So in a net zero-energy school, technical performance, the ostentatious visibility of energy production and moderation devices, and the local council’s (which owns the premises) pedagogical determination, come into conflict with the educational projects and practices of the teaching staff; in turn, the latter have problems developing their own professional autonomy, implementing their pedagogical practices and constructing the gradual autonomy of their pupils, in buildings where such uses and objectives have not been taken into account. Children are taught about sustainable development at school, and try to put this knowledge into practice at home, among members of their family. But family configurations only permit such practices to a certain extent, depending on the educational strategies of the parents, pre-existing energy cultures and the legitimacy that parents give the school as a socializing agent in this matter. As far as behavioural instructions are concerned, social mechanisms for transmitting knowledge are not taken into account. In both cases the instructions are supposed to turn children into energy and environmental actors, but they are not free and autonomous actors; like adults, they are caught up in action systems, constraints, logics and projects related to concrete situations. Furthermore, when passing the information on to adults, there is the problem of the latter’s own definition of autonomy, based on progressivity, support, reflexivity.
机译:可能是儿童能够解决环境和能源问题吗?如今,他们受到相当大的压力,成为不同生活领域的能量适度的大使,在学校学习这些问题并从儿童报纸和电视节目中接受建议。尚未将孩子们放在这个系统的“心脏”,是忘记他们有很少的代理,他们的学习过程基本上基于成年人,他们是他们教育中的利益相关者。因此,在零能源学校,技术性能,能源生产和适度设备的炫耀可见性,以及当地议会(拥有房屋)教学决心,与教学人员的教育项目和实践发生冲突;反过来,后者对自己的专业自主权有问题,实施他们的教学实践,构建他们学生的逐步自治,在这些用途和目标尚未考虑的建筑物中。儿童在学校进行了可持续发展,并试图将这些知识放在家里的家庭中实践。但是,根据父母的教育战略,预先存在的能量文化和父母在此事中作为社会化代理的合法性,若干方面只允许在一定程度上允许这种做法。就行为指示而言,没有考虑传输知识的社会机制。在这两种情况下,指示应该将儿童变成能源和环境行动者,但它们不是自由和自治的演员;与成年人一样,它们被赶上了与具体情况相关的行动系统,限制,逻辑和项目。此外,在将信息传递给成年人时,基于累进,支持,反应性,后者自身对自主定义的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号