首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data >Performance Comparison and Analysis of Yarn's Schedulers with Stress Cases
【24h】

Performance Comparison and Analysis of Yarn's Schedulers with Stress Cases

机译:应力情况下纱线调度器的性能比较与分析

获取原文

摘要

Hadoop, as a popular distributed storage and computing platform, has been widely used in many companies. Yarn is the resource management platform in Hadoop and plays an important role in the resource managing, because it can affect the cluster's energy efficiency and the usability for applications. The schedulers are the brain of Yarn, which manage and schedule resources from cluster to applications. In this paper, we conduct experiments to compare and analyze the performance of Yarn's schedulers. We use various scenarios to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of each scheduler from the perspective of response speed, cluster's efficiency, scheduler's speciality etc. Experimental results demonstrate that the FIFO Scheduler has a better performance and data locality sense for batch jobs processing than the other schedulers, but the Capacity Scheduler and the FIFO Scheduler have better response speed and cluster's usability than the FIFO Scheduler which has a hunger problem in mixed scenario.
机译:Hadoop作为一种流行的分布式存储和计算平台,已在许多公司中广泛使用。 Yarn是Hadoop中的资源管理平台,在资源管理中起着重要作用,因为它会影响集群的能源效率和应用程序的可用性。调度程序是Yarn的大脑,它可以管理和调度从群集到应用程序的资源。在本文中,我们进行实验以比较和分析Yarn调度程序的性能。我们从响应速度,集群效率,调度程序的特殊性等角度使用各种方案来说明每个调度程序的优缺点。实验结果表明,与其他调度程序相比,FIFO调度程序在批处理作业处理方面具有更好的性能和数据局部感,但是容量调度器和FIFO调度器比FIFO调度器具有更好的响应速度和群集可用性,而FIFO调度器在混合方案中存在饥饿问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号