首页> 外文会议>Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology >Comparative Analysis of Idea Generating Processes in Emerging and Developed Countries; Indonesia, Malaysia, and Japan
【24h】

Comparative Analysis of Idea Generating Processes in Emerging and Developed Countries; Indonesia, Malaysia, and Japan

机译:新兴发达国家思想思想的比较分析;印度尼西亚,马来西亚和日本

获取原文

摘要

In recent years, researchers have focused on innovations launched from emerging countries. Although several cases of innovative products developed in emerging countries have been reported, there are few studies investigating differences in the idea generating process in emerging and developed countries. The main purpose of this study is to investigate those differences by adopting an exploratory approach pursued through a series of idea generation experiments. The experiments were conducted using as subjects graduate school students in two emerging countries, Indonesia and Malaysia, and one developed county, Japan. To simulate a realistic new product development process, the experiment consisted of three parts: the participants developing ideas, experts evaluating the ideas, and then participants analyzing the process over several group discussions so that the points may be discerned in the development process where there are differences between emerging countries and developed countries. Differences on both idea characteristics and selection criteria were found. First, the Indonesian and Malaysian participants proposed feasible ideas having lower investment risk than did Japanese participants. Second, the participants from the two emerging countries selected ideas with greater confidence than did the Japanese participants. Third, the former groups made decisions on their ideas without referring to experts' evaluations in contrast to the latter group.
机译:近年来,研究人员专注于从新兴国家推出的创新。据报道,虽然有几种在新兴国家开发的创新产品案例,但很少有研究在新兴和发达国家的思想产生过程中调查差异。本研究的主要目的是通过采用通过一系列思想生成实验的探索方法来研究这些差异。该实验是在两个新兴国家,印度尼西亚和马来西亚和日本发达县的主题研究生院进行的。为了模拟逼真的新产品开发过程,实验组成了三个部分:参与者开发思想,评估思想的专家,然后参与者分析了几个小组讨论的过程,以便在有的开发过程中可以辨别出来的过程新兴国家与发达国家之间的差异。发现了思想特征和选择标准的差异。首先,印度尼西亚和马来西亚的参与者提出了比日本参与者更低的投资风险的可行思想。其次,来自两个新兴国家的参与者选择了比日本参与者更有信心的想法。第三,前群体对他们的想法做出了决定,而不是将专家评价与后一组相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号