首页> 外文会议>European corrosion congress >Global FRP standard - A comparison between four different design codes for FRP vessels
【24h】

Global FRP standard - A comparison between four different design codes for FRP vessels

机译:全球玻璃钢标准-玻璃钢船的四种不同设计规范之间的比较

获取原文

摘要

The use of FRP and dual laminates has grown a lot for manufacturing vessels and piping during the last years, due to its high corrosion resistance and cost-effectiveness compared with the expensive metallic alloys required for handling highly corrosive fluids. However, the criteria and procedures for designing FRP vessels all around the world are very different, giving birth to very different design codes for every geographical zone. As a result, it is complicated comparing these design codes to choose the one which fits better to our needs. The purpose of this study is comparing four different design codes for FRP vessels (AD-Merkblatt N1 [1], BS 4994:1987 [2], EN 13121 [3] and ASME RTP-1 Ed. 2007 [4]). To do so, five different tanks (two storage tanks, a scrubber and two horizontal pressure vessels) have been designed using all these codes. Next, the equations used for calculating every part of the tanks, and the results obtained have been analyzed and compared, showing the most important strong and weak points of every code, plus their similarities and differences. The full study called "Global FRP standards", has been published by Materials Technology Institute, Inc, (MTI) in 2015.
机译:在过去的几年中,由于FRP和双重层压板的使用具有很高的耐腐蚀性和成本效益,与处理高腐蚀性流体所需的昂贵金属合金相比,FRP和双重层压板的使用已得到了很大的发展。但是,全世界设计FRP船的标准和程序都大相径庭,因此每个地理区域的设计规范都大相径庭。结果,比较这些设计代码以选择更适合我们需求的设计代码变得很复杂。这项研究的目的是比较FRP船的四种不同设计规范(AD-Merkblatt N1 [1],BS 4994:1987 [2],EN 13121 [3]和ASME RTP-1 Ed。2007 [4])。为此,使用所有这些代码设计了五个不同的储罐(两个储罐,一个洗涤塔和两个水平压力容器)。接下来,对用于计算坦克各部分的方程式以及获得的结果进行了分析和比较,显示出每个代码最重要的优缺点,以及它们的异同。材料技术研究院有限公司(MTI)于2015年发布了名为“全球FRP标准”的完整研究报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号