首页> 外文会议>International Workshop on Big Data and Information Security >Performance Comparison of Rank Aggregation Using Borda and Copeland in Recommender System
【24h】

Performance Comparison of Rank Aggregation Using Borda and Copeland in Recommender System

机译:Borda和Copeland在推荐系统中的等级汇编的性能比较

获取原文

摘要

The rapid development of e-commerce will certainly be followed by an increasing number and more varied marketed products, making it confusing and time-consuming for users to choose from a large number of desired products. Consequently, a recommendation system is required to give products suggestion to the users with high accuracy. One of the most commonly techniques for the recommendation system is the collaborative filtering technique. However, this technique faces major problems, i.e., sparsity, scalability, and cold start. This paper combine clustering and ranking aggregation approaches to solve the problem. The clustering approach uses K-means algorithm. The approach is implemented into MovieLens dataset, which consists of the demographic and genre information. Meanwhile, the ranking aggregation approach uses Borda and Copeland methods to be compared. The results of the experiment show that Borda method is superior than Copeland method. The mean score of NDCG for Borda and Copeland methods are 0.6251 and 0.5649 respectively. Whilst the running time of Borda method is 63.6793 seconds faster than that of Copeland method.
机译:电子商务的快速发展肯定是越来越多的销售产品,令人困惑和耗时的令人困惑和耗时,可以从大量期望的产品中选择。因此,需要一种推荐系统,以高精度地向用户提供产品建议。推荐系统最常用的技术之一是协同过滤技术。然而,这种技术面临着主要问题,即稀疏性,可扩展性和冷启动。本文结合了聚类和排名聚集方法来解决问题。聚类方法使用K-Means算法。该方法是实施到Movielens数据集,由人口统计和类型信息组成。同时,排名聚集方法使用波尔达和槟城方法进行比较。实验结果表明,波尔达方法优于槟榔方法。 BORDA和COPELAND方法的NDCG的平均得分分别为0.6251和0.5649。虽然波尔达方法的运行时间比槟榔方法快63.6793秒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号