首页> 外文会议>International computer science and engineering conference >Efficiency comparisons between k-centers and k-means algorithms
【24h】

Efficiency comparisons between k-centers and k-means algorithms

机译:k中心和k均值算法之间的效率比较

获取原文

摘要

This paper proposes an under-sampling method with an algorithm which guarantees the sampling quality called k-centers algorithm. Then, the efficiency of the sampling using under-sampling method with k-means algorithm is compared with the proposed method. For the comparison purpose, four datasets obtained from UCI database were selected and the RIPPER classifier was used. From the experimental results, our under-sampling method with k-centers algorithm provided the Accuracy, Recall, and F-measure values higher than that obtained from the under-sampling with k-means algorithm in every dataset we used. The Precision value from our k-centers algorithm might be lower in some datasets, however, its average value computed out of all datasets is still higher than using the under-sampling method with k-means algorithm. Moreover, the experimental results showed that our under-sampling method with k-centers algorithm also decreases the Accuracy value obtained from the original data less than that using the under-sampling with k-means algorithm.
机译:提出了一种保证采样质量的算法,称为k中心算法。然后,将采用k均值算法的欠采样方法的采样效率与所提出的方法进行了比较。为了进行比较,选择了从UCI数据库获得的四个数据集,并使用了RIPPER分类器。从实验结果来看,我们使用的k中心算法的欠采样方法提供的准确性,查全率和F度量值高于我们使用的每个数据集中的k均值算法的欠采样所获得的值。我们的k中心算法的Precision值在某些数据集中可能较低,但是,从所有数据集中计算得出的平均值仍高于使用k-means算法的欠采样方法。此外,实验结果表明,与使用k均值欠采样算法相比,我们使用k中心算法的欠采样方法也降低了从原始数据获得的精度值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号