首页> 外文会议>Polyurethanes technical conference >Investigation on the Use of Flame Retarded Foam Plastic Insulation Materials in Building Construction
【24h】

Investigation on the Use of Flame Retarded Foam Plastic Insulation Materials in Building Construction

机译:阻燃泡沫塑料绝缘材料在建筑施工中的应用研究

获取原文

摘要

The state of California enacted CA AB 127, which mandates the California State Fire Marshal to review the California flammability standards for building insulation materials so as to develop new standards (i.e. test methods) that do not require the use of added flame retardants but ensure that overall building safety is maintained. The State Fire Marshal convened a Working Group to make recommendations on the issue. The Working Group was composed of (a) parties interested in ensuring improved fire safety for California buildings based on time-tested consensus-based codes and flammability standards and (b) parties who want to eliminate the use of flame retardants in building insulation. This paper represents the opinions of Working Group members interested in ensuring improved fire safety. Many types of insulation are used in California residential buildings but the Working Group focused exclusively on the more common commercial foam plastic insulation materials. Such materials are required by code to comply with a material fire test and, additionally, are severely restricted in their permitted uses by further code requirements, such as the use of barriers and/or composite fire testing. Commercial grades of common foam plastic insulation materials contain added flame retardants to meet the material fire test, but no codes or standards require the use of flame retardants. In the US, federal (CPSC) fire safety regulations require that some other insulation materials, especially cellulosic insulation, meet some criteria that also require the use of flame retardants. However, these other types of insulation were not addressed by the report of the Working Group. The US code fire safety requirements for foam plastic insulation, in effect since the 1976 Uniform Building Code, came about as a result of tragic fire losses in the 1960s and an FTC consent decree demanding that the plastics industry produce insulation that is used in a safe way in case of fire. The FTC consent decree also required the plastics industry to educate customers, perform research and undertake other activities to minimize the potential impact of insulation in case of fire. Compliance with the FTC requirements has ensured an excellent fire safety record for these materials in the US (based on fire loss statistics) and that fire losses associated with code-compliant use of foam plastic insulation in the US are minimal. The Working Group spent much time discussing concerns regarding: (a) the health effects of the decomposition and/or combustion products of flame retardants especially on firefighters and (b) the effectiveness of the fire testing requirements in place today, primarily because of the use of ASTM E84 as the material fire test. This report demonstrates, via a series of 30 questions and answers, that both concerns are unfounded. Firefighters are exposed to more serious health effects from fires than the general population. However, abundant scientific data demonstrate that the added effect of flame retardants to this health hazard is virtually negligible and there is no evidence that the trace levels of flame retardants found (possibly due to improved measurement techniques) have an actual measurable effect on firefighter health. Foam plastic insulation materials must comply not only with requirements based on ASTM E84 but with added composite fire testing and severe limitations on their use (especially in terms of the habitable environment, as opposed to compartments, such as crawl spaces, which are not suitable to be occupied). The barrier and composite testing limitations are insufficient, on their own, to ensure the proper building fire safety, particularly in view of the fact that modern fires are hotter than those when thermal barrier tests were developed and because the thermal barriers used were always assessed with flame retarded foams. ASTM E84 is a fire test used for many building applications, since the 1950s. It has been shown that materials that exhibit poor flame spread index results in the ASTM E84 will inevitably have poor fire performance in real fires. The improvement in fire performance provided by flame retardants to foam plastic insulation materials has been demonstrated by multiple other fire tests as well, including critically heat release tests (heat release being the most important property in a fire). Thus, eliminating the added protection offered by using those foam plastic insulation materials which meet improved fire safety requirements would most likely lead to a severe decrease in fire safety.
机译:加利福尼亚州颁布了CA AB 127,该法案要求加利福尼亚州消防局局长审查加利福尼亚建筑保温材料的可燃性标准,以便制定不需要使用添加的阻燃剂但要确保使用新的标准(即测试方法)。维护建筑物的整体安全。国家消防队长召集了一个工作组就此问题提出建议。工作组由(a)有兴趣在经过久经考验的基于共识的规范和易燃性标准的基础上确保改善加利福尼亚建筑物的消防安全的各方以及(b)希望在建筑物绝热材料中不使用阻燃剂的各方组成。本文代表了对确保改善消防安全感兴趣的工作组成员的观点。加利福尼亚州的住宅建筑物中使用了多种类型的隔热材料,但工作组仅专注于更常见的商业泡沫塑料隔热材料。法规要求此类材料必须符合材料耐火测试,此外,进一步的法规要求(例如使用屏障和/或复合耐火测试)会严格限制此类材料的允许使用。商业级别的普通泡沫塑料绝缘材料包含添加的阻燃剂,以满足材料的防火测试,但是没有任何法规或标准要求使用阻燃剂。在美国,联邦(CPSC)的消防安全法规要求某些其他隔热材料(尤其是纤维素隔热材料)满足某些标准,这些标准也要求使用阻燃剂。但是,工作组的报告未涉及这些其他类型的绝缘。自1960年代悲惨的火灾损失和FTC同意令要求塑料工业生产用于安全的隔热材料以来,美国法规对泡沫塑料隔热材料的消防安全要求自1976年《统一建筑规范》起生效。着火的方法。 FTC同意令还要求塑料行业教育客户,进行研究并进行其他活动,以最大程度地减少火灾时绝缘的潜在影响。遵守FTC的要求已确保了这些材料在美国的出色消防安全记录(基于失火统计),并且在美国,与符合规范的泡沫塑料绝缘材料使用相关的失火最少。工作组花了很多时间讨论有关以下方面的问题:(a)阻燃剂的分解和/或燃烧产物对健康的影响,特别是对消防员的影响;以及(b)当今制定的防火测试要求的有效性,主要是因为使用ASTM E84作为材料耐火测试。该报告通过一系列30个问题和答案表明,这两个问题都是没有根据的。消防人员遭受的火灾对健康的影响比一般人群要大。但是,大量的科学数据表明,阻燃剂对这种健康危害的附加影响几乎可以忽略不计,并且没有证据表明所发现的痕量阻燃剂(可能是由于改进的测量技术)对消防员的健康具有实际的可衡量的影响。泡沫塑料绝缘材料不仅必须符合基于ASTM E84的要求,而且还必须满足复合防火测试的要求,并严格限制其使用(尤其是在宜居环境方面,而不是像隔间这样的隔间,如不宜爬网的地方)被占领)。屏障和复合材料测试的限制本身不足以确保建筑物的消防安全,特别是考虑到现代火灾比开发热障测试时的火灾更热,并且始终使用评估方法来评估所使用的热障的事实。阻燃泡沫。自1950年代以来,ASTM E84是用于许多建筑应用的防火测试。已经证明,在ASTM E84中显示较差的火焰蔓延指数的材料在实际火灾中不可避免地具有较差的防火性能。阻燃剂对泡沫塑料绝缘材料提供的防火性能也得到了多项其他防火测试的证实,包括严格的散热测试(散热是火灾中最重要的特性)。因此,消除使用那些满足改进的消防安全要求的泡沫塑料绝缘材料所提供的附加保护,很可能会导致消防安全的严重下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号