首页> 外文会议>Polyurethanes technical conference >Investigation on the Use of Flame Retarded Foam Plastic Insulation Materials in Building Construction
【24h】

Investigation on the Use of Flame Retarded Foam Plastic Insulation Materials in Building Construction

机译:阻燃泡沫塑料绝缘材料在建筑施工中使用的调查

获取原文

摘要

The state of California enacted CA AB 127, which mandates the California State Fire Marshal to review the California flammability standards for building insulation materials so as to develop new standards (i.e. test methods) that do not require the use of added flame retardants but ensure that overall building safety is maintained. The State Fire Marshal convened a Working Group to make recommendations on the issue. The Working Group was composed of (a) parties interested in ensuring improved fire safety for California buildings based on time-tested consensus-based codes and flammability standards and (b) parties who want to eliminate the use of flame retardants in building insulation. This paper represents the opinions of Working Group members interested in ensuring improved fire safety. Many types of insulation are used in California residential buildings but the Working Group focused exclusively on the more common commercial foam plastic insulation materials. Such materials are required by code to comply with a material fire test and, additionally, are severely restricted in their permitted uses by further code requirements, such as the use of barriers and/or composite fire testing. Commercial grades of common foam plastic insulation materials contain added flame retardants to meet the material fire test, but no codes or standards require the use of flame retardants. In the US, federal (CPSC) fire safety regulations require that some other insulation materials, especially cellulosic insulation, meet some criteria that also require the use of flame retardants. However, these other types of insulation were not addressed by the report of the Working Group. The US code fire safety requirements for foam plastic insulation, in effect since the 1976 Uniform Building Code, came about as a result of tragic fire losses in the 1960s and an FTC consent decree demanding that the plastics industry produce insulation that is used in a safe way in case of fire. The FTC consent decree also required the plastics industry to educate customers, perform research and undertake other activities to minimize the potential impact of insulation in case of fire. Compliance with the FTC requirements has ensured an excellent fire safety record for these materials in the US (based on fire loss statistics) and that fire losses associated with code-compliant use of foam plastic insulation in the US are minimal. The Working Group spent much time discussing concerns regarding: (a) the health effects of the decomposition and/or combustion products of flame retardants especially on firefighters and (b) the effectiveness of the fire testing requirements in place today, primarily because of the use of ASTM E84 as the material fire test. This report demonstrates, via a series of 30 questions and answers, that both concerns are unfounded. Firefighters are exposed to more serious health effects from fires than the general population. However, abundant scientific data demonstrate that the added effect of flame retardants to this health hazard is virtually negligible and there is no evidence that the trace levels of flame retardants found (possibly due to improved measurement techniques) have an actual measurable effect on firefighter health. Foam plastic insulation materials must comply not only with requirements based on ASTM E84 but with added composite fire testing and severe limitations on their use (especially in terms of the habitable environment, as opposed to compartments, such as crawl spaces, which are not suitable to be occupied). The barrier and composite testing limitations are insufficient, on their own, to ensure the proper building fire safety, particularly in view of the fact that modern fires are hotter than those when thermal barrier tests were developed and because the thermal barriers used were always assessed with flame retarded foams. ASTM E84 is a fire test used for many building applications, since the 1950s. It has been shown that materials
机译:加州颁布了CA AB 127,该公司授权加州州火灾委员会审查加州燃烧性标准,用于建立绝缘材料,以开发不需要使用增加的阻燃剂的新标准(即测试方法),但是保持整体建筑安全性。国家火灾记分召开了一个工作组,提出了关于该问题的建议。工作组由有兴趣的缔约方组成,该缔约方根据基于时间测试的基于达成的基于达成的共识和可燃标准以及想要消除阻燃剂在建筑绝缘体中使用的缔约方来改善加州建筑物的缔约方。本文代表了有兴趣确保改善防火安全的工作组成员的意见。加州住宅建筑中使用了许多类型的绝缘材料,但工作组专注于更常见的商业泡沫塑料绝缘材料。这些材料是通过代码来符合物质火灾测试的代码,并且另外,通过进一步的代码要求,例如使用屏障和/或复合火灾测试的允许使用。商业等级的普通泡沫塑料绝缘材料含有添加的阻燃剂,以满足材料火灾试验,但没有代码或标准需要使用阻燃剂。在美国,联邦(CPSC)消防安全法规要求其他一些绝缘材料,尤其是纤维素绝缘,符合一些需要使用阻燃剂的标准。但是,工作组的报告未解决这些其他类型的绝缘。泡沫塑料绝缘的美国代码消防安全要求,自1976年统一建设码以来,由于20世纪60年代的悲惨火灾损失以及FTC同意法令要求塑料行业生产安全性的保险在火灾的情况下。 FTC同意法令还要求塑料行业教育客户,进行研究,并进行其他活动,以尽量减少绝缘在火灾中的潜在影响。遵守FTC要求确保了美国这些材料的出色的消防安全记录(基于消防损失统计数据),并且在美国兼顾泡沫塑料绝缘的泡沫塑料绝缘相关的消防损失是最小的。工作组花了很多时间讨论了关于的问题:(a)阻燃剂的分解和/或燃烧产物的健康效应,特别是在消防员和(b)当今火灾测试要求的有效性,主要是因为使用ASTM E84作为材料火灾试验。本报告通过一系列30个问题和答案表现出来,这两个问题都毫无根据。消防员暴露于火灾的更严重的健康影响,而不是一般人群。然而,丰富的科学数据表明,阻燃剂对这种健康危害的增加的效果几乎可以忽略不计,并且没有证据表明发现的痕量阻燃剂(可能是由于改进的测量技术)对消防员健康具有实际可测量的影响。泡沫塑料绝缘材料不仅必须根据ASTM E84的要求符合要求,但随着复合火灾测试和对其使用的严重限制(特别是在可居住的环境方面,而不是爬行空间,也不适合被占领)。屏障和复合测试限制不足,以确保适当的建筑物安全性,特别是鉴于现代火灾比那些发育热障试验的现代火灾更热,并且由于随着所用的热障碍被评估火焰迟钝的泡沫。自20世纪50年代以来,ASTM E84是用于许多建筑应用的消防测试。已经显示了材料

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号