首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping conference >TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EXTENSION OF SECTION XI APPENDIX C PIPE FLAW EVALUATION PROCEDURES TO PIPE DIAMETERS LESS THAN NPS 4
【24h】

TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EXTENSION OF SECTION XI APPENDIX C PIPE FLAW EVALUATION PROCEDURES TO PIPE DIAMETERS LESS THAN NPS 4

机译:附录C中第XI节的扩展技术基础少于NPS的管道直径评估程序4

获取原文

摘要

A lower limit restriction on nominal pipe size (NPS) was originally set as NPS 4 (DN 100) in ASME Section Ⅺ, Appendix C pipe flaw evaluation procedures (1983 Edition). Pipe less than NPS 4 mat contained flaws could not be evaluated to the code and had to be repaired or a relief request submitted. The primary basis for this analysis restriction was that stress analysis information for small diameter lines required for flaw evaluation would be limited for a detailed flaw evaluation. The plant owner would opt to repair such flawed pipe rather than perform an evaluation. However, current evaluation procedures are generally applicability to smaller pipe sizes. Because ASME Appendix C procedures are referenced in code cases that cover small diameter pipe, and because small diameter pipe can be difficult to repair due to cost and radiation exposure, a proposed revision to ASME Section Ⅺ has extended Appendix C procedures to pipe sizes down to NPS 1 (DN 25). This improvement is now in the 2013 Edition of Section Ⅺ and gives the plant owner the option for evaluation for such situations.
机译:在ASME第(节附录C管道缺陷评估程序(1983年版)中,公称管道尺寸(NPS)的下限限制最初设置为NPS 4(DN 100)。小于NPS 4垫子的管道中含有缺陷的管道无法评估为规范,因此必须进行维修或提交救济请求。这种分析限制的主要依据是,缺陷评估所需的小直径线的应力分析信息将受到限制,无法进行详细的缺陷评估。工厂所有者将选择修理此类有缺陷的管道,而不是进行评估。但是,当前的评估程序通常适用于较小的管道尺寸。由于在覆盖小直径管道的规范案例中引用了ASME附录C程序,并且由于成本和辐射暴露,小直径管道可能难以维修,因此对ASME第Section节的拟议修订将附录C程序扩展到了最小尺寸NPS 1(DN 25)。现在,此改进已在第Section部分的2013年版中提供,并为工厂所有者提供了针对此类情况进行评估的选项。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号