首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Professional Communication Conference >Perceptions of content authoring methodologies in technical communication: The perceived benefits of single sourcing
【24h】

Perceptions of content authoring methodologies in technical communication: The perceived benefits of single sourcing

机译:技术交流中内容创作方法的看法:单一采购的可感知收益

获取原文

摘要

Increasingly, technical communicators have adopted single-source authoring as an efficient approach to content authoring. However, the integration of single-source authoring has been widely debated, and technical communicators cannot agree on the need for DITA and other content authoring tools for producing high quality and user-focused documentation. I single out DITA because it is the latest and most widely used and discussed method of single-source authoring. As a framework and corresponding technology within technical communication, many technical communicators accept DITA-based authoring as the best approach to content authoring; however, the technical communication field needs to investigate this supposition. My research examines this approach to content authoring by looking at some of the components of DITA authoring such as the following: organizational efficiency; content reuse; creating consistent content; and separating content from formatting. The primary goal of this paper is to determine the perceptions of use from the current literature and from practitioners that participate in discussions on this topic in online communities. This paper reports the data from a pilot study of online technical communication communities that discuss authoring methodologies. The preliminary data suggests that technical communicators corroborate what the literature of the field says regarding the most discussed components of DITA authoring, but also intimates that the perceptions may not match the professed value for creating effective documentation. This research can help inform the results of future user experience studies on the documents produced from alternative authoring methodologies. Additionally, this combined research can also apprise academia for how programs develop curricula to address the theoretical “craft or commodity” question, how to teach content authoring in courses, and which tools academic programs should teach.
机译:技术交流者越来越多地采用单一来源创作作为内容创作的有效方法。但是,关于单一源创作的集成问题已引起广泛争议,技术传播者无法就DITA和其他内容创作工具的需求达成一致,以产生高质量和以用户为中心的文档。我之所以选择DITA,是因为DITA是最新的,使用最广泛且讨论最多的单一来源创作方法。作为技术交流中的框架和相应技术,许多技术交流者都接受基于DITA的创作作为内容创作的最佳方法。但是,技术交流领域需要对此假设进行研究。我的研究通过研究DITA创作的一些组成部分来研究这种内容创作方法,例如:组织效率;内容重用;创建一致的内容;并将内容与格式分开。本文的主要目的是确定当前使用的文献以及参与在线社区中有关此主题讨论的从业人员的使用感觉。本文报告了在线技术交流社区的初步研究中的数据,该社区讨论了创作方法。初步数据表明,技术交流员证实了该领域的文献对DITA创作中讨论最多的组成部分的说法,但也暗示人们的看法可能与创建有效文档所声称的价值不符。这项研究可以帮助从其他创作方法中产生的文档,为将来的用户体验研究的结果提供信息。此外,这项综合研究还可以使学术界了解程序如何开发课程以解决理论上的“工艺或商品”问题,如何教授课程中的内容创作以及学术程序应教授的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号