首页> 外文会议>International conference on information systems >Mobile Application Quality and Platform Stickiness under Formal vs. Self-Control - Evidence from an Experimental Study
【24h】

Mobile Application Quality and Platform Stickiness under Formal vs. Self-Control - Evidence from an Experimental Study

机译:正式与自我控制下的移动应用质量和​​平台粘性-来自实验研究的证据

获取原文

摘要

Although control modes have been extensively studied in IS research, minimal research attention has been directed towards understanding how different control mechanisms operate in software-based platforms. Drawing on self-determination theory and IS control literature, we conducted a laboratory experiment with 138 participants in which we examined how well third-party developers contribute to a mobile app development platform in terms of output quality and whether they are willing to stick with this platform under formal (i.e., output and process) and informal (i.e., self) control. We demonstrate that self-control has consistently stronger effects on application quality and platform stickiness than formal control modes. We also shed light on perceived autonomy as explanatory mechanism through which the control modes' effects are mediated. Taken together, our study highlights the theoretically important finding that self-determination among third-party developers is a stronger driving force than typical hierarchical control mechanisms. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
机译:尽管在IS研究中已经对控制模式进行了广泛的研究,但对研究的关注却很少,其目的是理解不同的控制机制如何在基于软件的平台中运行。利用自决理论和IS控制文献,我们进行了138名参与者的实验室实验,从输出质量以及他们是否愿意遵守这一观点出发,我们研究了第三方开发人员对移动应用程序开发平台的贡献程度在正式(即输出和过程)和非正式(即自我)控制下的平台。我们证明,与正式控制模式相比,自我控制对应用程序质量和平台粘性的影响始终如一。我们还阐明了感知自治是作为解释机制的中介机制,通过该机制可以调节控制方式的效果。两者合计,我们的研究突出了理论上重要的发现,即与典型的分层控制机制相比,第三方开发人员之间的自决是更强大的驱动力。讨论了对研究和实践的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号