首页> 外文会议>International conference on vulnerability and risk analysis and management;International symposium on uncertainty, modeling and analysis >Sensitivity Analysis of Different Capacity Spectrum Approaches to Assumptions in the Modeling, Capacity and Demand Representations
【24h】

Sensitivity Analysis of Different Capacity Spectrum Approaches to Assumptions in the Modeling, Capacity and Demand Representations

机译:不同容量谱方法对建模,容量和需求表示的假设的敏感性分析

获取原文

摘要

Several capacity spectrum assessment methods exist for determination of structural performance of building models subjected to earthquake loading. The repetition of such analysis for earthquakes of increasing intensity will result in the derivation of analytical fragility functions. A comparison of three capacity spectrum assessment approaches (N2, SPO2IDA and FRACAS) has been carried out, highlighting the advantages and limitations of the approaches. Two experimental case studies have been chosen to evaluate the IM-EDP (S_a-S_d , ISD_(max%)) estimates obtained from the three different capacity spectrum procedures as well as from non-linear time-history analyses (NLTHA). It is found that all three approaches perform well in estimating the response of a simple steel frame but that FRACAS provides the best estimate of the response of an irregular reinforced concrete frame. It is concluded that further comparisons of the capacity spectrum approaches with large-scale experiments on structures are required to draw more general conclusions.
机译:存在几种用于确定地震荷载作用下建筑模型结构性能的能力谱评估方法。对于强度不断增加的地震,重复进行这种分析将导致分析易碎性函数的推导。比较了三种容量频谱评估方法(N2,SPO2IDA和FRACAS),突出了该方法的优点和局限性。选择了两个实验案例研究来评估从三种不同的容量谱程序以及非线性时间历史分析(NLTHA)获得的IM-EDP(S_a-S_d,ISD_(max%))估计值。结果发现,这三种方法在评估简单钢框架的响应方面均表现良好,但是FRACAS提供了对不规则钢筋混凝土框架的响应的最佳估计。结论是,需要对容量谱方法与结构的大规模实验进行进一步比较,以得出更一般的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号