首页> 外文会议>International sorption heat pump conference >Energy saving performance assessment of the hybrid refrigeration cycle with working pairs of HFCs and organic absorbents
【24h】

Energy saving performance assessment of the hybrid refrigeration cycle with working pairs of HFCs and organic absorbents

机译:使用氢氟碳化合物和有机吸收剂工作对的混合制冷循环的节能性能评估

获取原文

摘要

With the aim to developing the potential working pairs for the absorption-compression hybrid refrigeration cycle, the energy saving performance of nine different working pairs composed of fluorohydrocarbon refrigerants (HFCs) and organic absorbents have been evaluated. The investigated refrigerants in this work include 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (R134a), 1,1-difluoroethane (R152a), difluoromethane (R32) and various organic compounds such as N,N-dimethylfomamide (DMF), N/N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC) and dimethylether diethylene glycol (DMEDEG) constitute the absorbents. Especially, the thermodynamics properties of the systems R134a + DMAC, R152a + DMF, R152a + DMAC, R152a + DMEDEG, R32 + DMAC and R32+DMEDEG have been measured and evaluated in our previous works. Firstly, with the aid of Aspen Plus software, the overall coefficient performance (COP_(HC)) and circulation ratio (f) of the hybrid refrigeration cycle were calculated for the nine working pairs. Then the systems R32 + DMF, R32 + DMAC, R152a + DMAC and R134a + DMF were selected as the potential working pairs based on above cycle performance for further simulation study. In addition, on the basis of two new cycle evaluation criterions, the heat powered coefficient of performance (ω) and electricity saving rate (η), the effects of generator temperature, absorber temperature and compressor outlet pressure ratio (λ) on the energy saving performance were also discussed. The results show that the ω and η values increase with increasing generator temperatures, but decrease with increasing absorber temperatures. It is also found that the systems R152a + DMAC and R134a + DMF exhibit obvious advantage in electricity saving benefits than others when the generator temperature is higher than 80°C. What's more, under the specified working conditions, there is an optimum compressor outlet pressure ratio which corresponds to the maximum ω and η values of the hybrid refrigeration cycle. The maximum electricity saving rate value 66.33% is obtained by the system R152a + DMAC, followed by R134a + DMF, R32 + DMF and R32 + DMAC systems, the maximum electricity saving rate values of them are 62.65%, 50.01% and 46.03%, respectively. In terms of overall energy saving performances, the systems R152a + DMAC and R134a + DMF are better options to be investigated and developed as the working pairs for the hybrid refrigeration cycle.
机译:旨在为吸收压缩混合制冷循环开发潜在的工作对,已经评估了由氟代烃制冷剂(HFC)和有机吸收剂组成的九个不同工作对的节能性能。该工作中的研究包括1,1,1,2-四氟乙烷(R134A),1,1-二氟乙烷(R152A),二氟甲烷(R32)和各种有机化合物,如N,N-二甲基胺(DMF),N / N-二甲基乙酰胺(DMAC)和二甲基醚二甘醇(DMEDEG)构成吸收剂。特别地,在我们之前的作品中测量并评估了系统R134A + DMAC,R134A + DMAC,R152A + DMF,R152A + DMAC,R152A + DMAC和R32 + DMEDEG的热力学性质。首先,借助Aspen Plus软件,为九个工作对计算混合制冷循环的总系数性能(COP_(HC))和循环比(F)。然后根据上述循环性能选择系统R32 + DMF,R32 + DMAC,R152A + DMAC和R134A + DMF作为进一步仿真研究的循环性能。另外,在两个新的周期评估标准的基础上,性能的热量系数(ω)和节电速率(η),发电机温度,吸收温度和压缩机出口压力比(λ)的效果在节能上还讨论了表现。结果表明,ω和η值随着发电机温度的增加而增加,但随着吸收温度的增加而降低。还发现,当发电机温度高于80°C时,系统R152A + DMAC和R134A + DMF在节省的益处中表现出明显的优势。更重要的是,在指定的工作条件下,存在最佳压缩机出口压力比,其对应于混合制冷循环的最大ω和η值。通过系统R152A + DMAC获得最大电力节电率值66.33%,其次是R134A + DMF,R32 + DMF和R32 + DMAC系统,它们的最大电力节水率值为62.65%,50.01%和46.03%,分别。在整体节能性能方面,系统R152A + DMAC和R134A + DMF是更好的选择和开发作为混合制冷循环的工作对的更好选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号