首页> 外文会议>IEEE Aerospace Conference >Changing the Paradigm GSFC's Role in the MAVEN Mission to Mars Lessons Learned from the MAVEN MOS/GDS effort: You're not doing Earth Science Anymore, Dorothy!
【24h】

Changing the Paradigm GSFC's Role in the MAVEN Mission to Mars Lessons Learned from the MAVEN MOS/GDS effort: You're not doing Earth Science Anymore, Dorothy!

机译:从MAVEN MOS / GDS的努力中汲取了MAVEN的MAVEN任务中的PARADIGM在MAVEN任务中的角色:你不再做了地球科学了,多萝西!

获取原文

摘要

The Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN Mission (MAVEN), successfully launched 18 November 2013, will explore the planet's upper atmosphere, ionosphere and interactions with the sun and solar wind. One of MAVEN's unique circumstances is the fact that it is a Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) flight project. Despite being an international leader in Earth and Space Science Missions, and providing instruments for planetary missions, GSFC has not had the project office in the development of planetary missions. Until the selection of MAVEN as NASA's second Mars Scout, the GSFC Flight Projects Directorate had not had full management responsibility for the development of an entire Mars mission. This paper will focus on the dovetailing of the Spacecraft (S/C) Team's and GSFC's approach to Requirements Management, Verification & Validation, (V&V) and the Ground and Operations test programs. As the MAVEN development progressed, the GSFC-based MAVEN project Mission Operations and Ground Data System (MOS/GDS) team quickly realized that a different paradigm was needed. GSFC's approach used on Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) Earth Science missions, GSFC's predominant background and experience, did not lend itself to the MAVEN mission. Instead, the S/C team brought the planetary mission approach to the project as the subject matter experts for Mars missions. From their previous experience on Mars Odyssey, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), and the Jovian Juno mission, heritage runs deep on MAVEN. Heritage provides a simplified and cost-effective approach, but not without its pitfalls. Early feedback from the review cycle highlighted the need to collaborate on the implementation. Synergy was needed between GSFC standards, GOLD Rules, NASA standards and expectations, and the established planetary mission heritage, experience and processes. The MAVEN project needed to find a new model. Through collaboration, the MOS/GDS Team and the Spacecraft (S/C) Team adapted resources to work within the heritage framework while addressing the new expectations. The project level V&V plan was reworked, the test program modified, and the processes updated to meet the project needs.
机译:2013年11月18日成功推出的火星氛围和挥发性进化任务(Maven)将探讨地球的上层大气,电离层和与太阳风的互动。 Maven的独特情节之一是这是戈达德太空飞行中心(GSFC)飞行项目。尽管是地球和空间科学任务的国际领导者,但为行星任务提供了工具,GSFC在行星任务的发展中没有项目办公室。直到选择Maven作为美国宇航局的第二火星侦察兵,GSFC航班项目董事会对整个火星使命的发展没有全面管理责任。本文将重点关注航天器(S / C)团队和GSFC对需求管理,验证和验证,(V&V)和地面和运营测试计划的方法的疏忽。随着Maven的发展进展,基于GSFC的Maven项目任务运营和地面数据系统(MOS / GDS)团队迅速意识到需要不同的范式。 GSFC在低地轨道(Leo)地球科学任务中使用的方法,GSFC的主要背景和经验,并没有向Maven使命赋予。相反,S / C团队将该项目的行星使命方法作为火星任务的主题专家。从他们以前的Mars Odyssey经验,火星侦察轨道(MRO)以及Jovian Juno Mission,遗产在Maven深处。遗产提供简化且经济高效的方法,但没有陷阱。审查周期的早期反馈突出了对实施的必要性。 GSFC标准,黄金规则,美国宇航局标准和期望之间需要协同作用,以及建立的行星使命遗产,经验和流程。 Maven项目需要找到一个新型号。通过协作,MOS / GDS团队和航天器(S / C)团队适应资源,同时解决新的期望。项目级V&V计划重新加工,测试程序修改,并更新的流程以满足项目需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号