首页> 外文会议>Conference on empirical methods in natural language processing >Team SWEEPer: Joint Sentence Extraction and Fact Checking with Pointer Networks
【24h】

Team SWEEPer: Joint Sentence Extraction and Fact Checking with Pointer Networks

机译:团队清扫员:用指针网络联合句提取和事实检查

获取原文

摘要

Many tasks such as question answering and reading comprehension rely on information extracted from unreliable sources. These systems would thus benefit from knowing whether a statement from an unreliable source is correct. We present experiments on the FEVER (Fact Extraction and VERification) task, a shared task that involves selecting sentences from Wikipedia and predicting whether a claim is supported by those sentences, refuted, or there is not enough information. Fact checking is a task that benefits from not only asserting or disputing the veracity of a claim but also finding evidence for that position. As these tasks are dependent on each other, an ideal model would consider the veracity of the claim when finding evidence and also find only the evidence that is relevant. We thus jointly model sentence extraction and verification on the FEVER shared task. Among all participants, we ranked 5th on the blind test set (prior to any additional human evaluation of the evidence).
机译:许多任务,如问题应答和阅读理解依赖于从不可靠来源提取的信息。因此,这些系统将从知道来自不可靠的来源的语句是正确的。我们对发烧(事实提取和验证)任务进行了实验,这是一个共享任务,涉及从维基百科的选择句子,并预测这些句子是否支持索赔,驳斥或没有足够的信息。事实检查是一项任务,不仅是断言或争议索赔的真实性,而且还为该职位寻找证据。由于这些任务彼此依赖,因此在寻找证据时,理想的模型将考虑索赔的真实性,并且只发现有关的证据。因此,我们共同模拟了发烧共享任务的句子提取和核查。在所有参与者中,我们在盲目测试集中排名第五(在任何额外的人类评估证据之前)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号