首页> 外文会议>IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference >Comparison of 4-class and Continuous Fat/Water Methods for Whole-Body, MR-Based PET Attenuation Correction
【24h】

Comparison of 4-class and Continuous Fat/Water Methods for Whole-Body, MR-Based PET Attenuation Correction

机译:全身4级和连续脂肪/水方法的比较,基于MR的PET衰减校正

获取原文

摘要

The goal of this study was to compare two approaches for MR-based PET patient attenuation correction (AC) in whole-body FDG-PET imaging using a tri-modality PET/CT & MR setup. Sixteen clinical whole-body FDG patients were included in this study. Mean standard uptake values (SUV) were measured for liver and lung volumes-of-interest for comparison. Maximum SUV values were measured in 18 FDG-avid features in ten of the patients. The AC methods compared to gold-standard CT-based AC were segmentation of the CT (air, lung, fat, water), MR image segmentation with 4 tissue classes (air, lung, fat, water) and segmentation with air, lung and a continuous fat/water method. Results: The magnitude of uptake value differences induced by CT-based image segmentation were similar but lower on average than those found using the MR-derived AC methods. The average liver SUV difference with that found using CTAC was 1.3%, 10.4% and 5.7% for 4-class segmented CT, 4-class MRAC and continuous fat/water MRAC methods, respectively. The average FDG-avid feature SUV_(max) difference was -0.5%, 1.7% and -1.6% for 4-class segmented CT, 4-class MRAC and continuous fat/water MRAC methods, respectively. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that both 4-class and continuous fat/water AC methods provided adequate quantitation in the body, and that the continuous fat/water method was within 5.7% on average for SUV_(mean) in liver and 1.6% on average for SUV_(max) for FDG-avid features.
机译:本研究的目的是使用三种方式PET / CT和MR设置比较全身FDG-PET成像中的两种基于MR的PET患者衰减校正(AC)方法。本研究纳入了16例临床全身FDG患者。测量平均标准摄取值(SUV),用于肝脏和肺部的患者进行比较。在1名患者的18个FDG-Avid特征中测量了最大SUV值。与金标准CT的AC相比的AC方法是CT(空气,肺,脂肪,水)的分段,用4种组织类(空气,肺,脂肪,水)和空气,肺和和细分的分段连续脂肪/水法。结果:CT基图像分割引起的摄取值差异的大小相似但平均值低于使用MR衍生的AC方法的那些。 4级分段CT,4级MRAC和连续脂肪/水MRAC方法的平均肝脏SUV差异为1.3%,10.4%和5.7%。对于4级分段CT,4级MRAC和连续脂肪/水MRAC方法,平均FDG-AVID特征SUV_(MAX)差异为-0.5%,1.7%和-1.6%。结论:结果表明,4级和连续的脂肪/水AC方法在体内提供了足够的定量,并且连续脂肪/水方法平均在肝脏(平均值)的5.7%以内,平均为1.6%对于FDG-Avid功能的SUV_(MAX)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号