首页> 外文会议>IEEE Global Communications Conference >A Comparative Analysis on Resource Discovery Protocols for The Internet of Things
【24h】

A Comparative Analysis on Resource Discovery Protocols for The Internet of Things

机译:物资互联网资源发现协议的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

Resources discovery is a fundamental requirement to the full realization of the vision of Internet of Things. Discovery includes resource properties, capabilities, and metadata. It enables consumers to build IoT applications and services that utilize “smart things” with no prior knowledge about these things. This paper studies three of the most commonly used discovery protocols, CoAP, MQTT and UPnP. We compare between their performance and behavior in IoT deployments. Each protocol is implemented and deployed on a mobile phone as a client and a Raspberry Pi as a broker/server. The implementation includes a WeMo switch and a TI SensorTag as resources. The paper provides insights on the different features, behavioural attributes, and a comparative analysis between these protocols. We also present performance indexes of each protocol in terms of memory and CPU usage, latency, and traffic exchange between a publisher and a subscriber. Our analysis shows that despite the three protocols are fundamentally different and each one has pros and cons, they are all highly useful in IoT environments. However, CoAP is generally more flexible and scalable, but requires a higher memory footprint.
机译:资源发现是对充分实现事物愿景的根本要求。 Discovey包括资源属性,功能和元数据。它使消费者能够构建利用“智能事物”的IOT应用程序和服务,而没有关于这些事情的先验知识。本文研究了三种最常用的发现协议,CAAP,MQTT和UPnP。我们在IOT部署中的性能和行为之间进行比较。每个协议都是在手机上实现和部署作为客户端和作为代理/服务器的raspberry pi。该实现包括WEMO交换机和作为资源的TI SensorTag。本文提供了对不同特征,行为属性以及这些协议之间的比较分析的见解。我们还在发布者和订户之间的内存和CPU使用率,延迟和流量交换方面存在每个协议的性能索引。我们的分析表明,尽管三个协议根本不同,但每个协议都有利弊,它们在物联网环境中都非常有用。但是,COAP通常更灵活且可扩展,但需要更高的内存占用空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号