【24h】

Potential Regulatory Use of Risk Limit Curves

机译:风险限制曲线的潜在监管使用

获取原文

摘要

This paper addresses the regulatory applicability of a safety limit curve approach that is not only probabilistic but also provides a true constraint on risk. In the 1960s F. R. Farmer proposed the use of a safety limit curve as a means of assessing the acceptability of accident scenarios based not only on their consequences (a deterministic approach) but also on their assessed frequencies. A similar concept was proposed in NUREG-1860, as a potential technology neutral framework (TNF), which could be applied not only to light water reactor applications but to any type of advanced nuclear power plant. Both the Farmer approach and the TNF approach provide criteria for the acceptability of an event defined by a couplet of frequency and consequence, acceptable if below the limit curve and unacceptable above the curve. The dilemma is that as the discretization of the spectrum of accident scenarios becomes more refined, the restriction becomes less stringent. By establishing a limit curve on the complementary cumulative distribution function of accident scenarios, we can impose a limit on the total risk which is robust to different levels of analysis detail. The paper discusses how a risk limit curve can be used to address the extension of the design basis into the regime of beyond design basis accidents, as discussed in NUREG-2150, "A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework."
机译:本文涉及安全限制曲线方法的监管适用性,不仅是概率,而且提供了风险的真实约束。在20世纪60年代,R.农民建议使用安全限制曲线作为评估事故情景的可接受性的手段,不仅基于其后果(确定性方法),而且还在其评估的频率上。在NUREG-1860中提出了一种类似的概念,作为潜在的技术中性框架(TNF),其不仅可以应用于轻度水反应器应用,而是任何类型的先进核电站。农民方法和TNF方法都提供了由频率对联和后果对联定义的事件的可接受性的标准,如果低于限制曲线和曲线上方的不可接受的话。困境是,由于事故情景频谱的离散化变得更加精致,因此限制变得不那么严格。通过在事故情景的互补累积分布函数上建立限制曲线,我们可以对不同水平的分析细节施加强大的风险限制。本文讨论了风险限制曲线如何用于将设计基础的扩展到超越设计基础事故的制度,如Nureg-2150所讨论的,“拟议的风险管理监管框架”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号