首页> 外文会议>ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition >ON THE COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF UNFLUIDIZED AND FLUIDIZED BED DYNAMICS
【24h】

ON THE COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF UNFLUIDIZED AND FLUIDIZED BED DYNAMICS

机译:流化床和流化床动力学的计算模型研究

获取原文

摘要

Two factors of great importance when considering gas-solid fluidized bed dynamics are pressure drop and void fraction, which is the volume fraction of the gas phase. It is, of course, possible to obtain pressure drop and void fraction data through experimentation, but this tends to be costly and time consuming. It is much preferable to be able to efficiently computationally model fluidized bed dynamics. In the present work, ANSYS FLUENT is used to simulate fluidized bed dynamics using an Eulerian-Eulerian multiphase flow model. By comparing the simulations using FLUENT to experimental data as well as to data from other fluidized bed codes such as Multiphase Flow with Interphase exchanges (MFIX), it is possible to show the strengths and limitations of FLUENT with respect to multiphase flow modeling. The simulations described herein will focus on modeling of beds in the unfluidized regime, where the inlet gas velocity is less than the minimum fluidization velocity, and will deem to shed some light on the discrepancies between experimental data and FLUENT results. In addition, this paper will also include comparisons between experimental data and simulation data in the fluidized regime based on void fraction contours and profiles.
机译:考虑气固流化床动力学时,两个非常重要的因素是压降和空隙率,空隙率是气相的体积分数。当然,可以通过实验获得压降和空隙率数据,但这往往是昂贵且费时的。能够有效计算流化床动力学的模型是非常可取的。在当前的工作中,ANSYS FLUENT用于使用Eulerian-Eulerian多相流模型模拟流化床动力学。通过将使用FLUENT进行的模拟与实验数据以及其他流化床代码(例如具有相间交换的多相流(MFIX))的数据进行比较,可以显示FLUENT在多相流建模方面的优势和局限性。本文所述的模拟将集中于在未流化状态下的床层建模,其中入口气体速度小于最小流化速度,并且将为实验数据和FLUENT结果之间的差异提供一些启示。此外,本文还将基于空隙率的轮廓和轮廓,对流态化过程中的实验数据和模拟数据进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号