首页> 外文会议>European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference >Law Enforcement Authorities' Legal Digital Evidence Gathering: Legal, Integrity and Chain-of-Custody Requirement
【24h】

Law Enforcement Authorities' Legal Digital Evidence Gathering: Legal, Integrity and Chain-of-Custody Requirement

机译:执法机构的法律数字证据收集:法律,完整性和产销监管链要求

获取原文

摘要

When carrying out criminal investigations, Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs) apply new technology in very effective ways. However at worst, LEAs must perform many stages twice with the help of different technical tools. When investigating the identity of criminals LEAs may apply totally different technical tools than when gathering evidences for charge, because the data provided by investigating may not be valid in court. For that reason, a new monitoring system that goes beyond state of the art is needed. Three organizational layers need attentions: 1) LEA, the people that actually retrieve and store the information. 2) Prosecutors and their offices, how they get access to the information. 3) Courts, the final destination of the retrieved information. Until now, the information gathering tools for LEAs have been engineered focusing only on the best way to retrieve the information from the target. The attention paid to the legal, integrity and chain-of-custody requirements as well as social acceptance and legal oversight in connection with retrieving information has been inadequate and guidance on the matters has existed only in manuals written by legal departments.
机译:在执行刑事调查时,执法机构(LEA)以非常有效的方式应用新技术。然而,在最坏的情况下,租赁必须在不同的技术工具的帮助下进行两次阶段。调查犯罪分子的身份时,租赁可能会应用完全不同的技术工具,而不是收集费用时,因为调查提供的数据可能无效。因此,需要一个超越艺术状态的新监控系统。三个组织层需要注意:1)LEA,实际检索和存储信息的人。 2)检察官及其办公室,他们如何获得信息。 3)法院,检索信息的最终目的地。到目前为止,租赁的信息收集工具已经专注于从目标中检索信息的最佳方法。与检索信息相关的法律,诚信和托管要求的关注,社会接受和合法监督一直是不充分的,并在法律部门撰写的手册中存在对事项的指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号