首页> 外文会议>American Water Works Association annual conference exposition >Removal of Constituents of Emerging Concern by Ozone and Advanced Oxidation Process – a Bench-Scale Approach
【24h】

Removal of Constituents of Emerging Concern by Ozone and Advanced Oxidation Process – a Bench-Scale Approach

机译:臭氧和高级氧化工艺去除新出现的成分的基准方法

获取原文

摘要

Bench-scale ozone (O_3) and O_3 in combination with hydrogen peroxide (H_2O_2) tests wereconducted to evaluate the removal of selected constituents of emerging concern (CECs) added toMetropolitan Water District of Southern California’s (Metropolitan’s) source waters. Whendetected, CECs in Metropolitan’s source and finished waters have been in the low ng/L range-levels at which there has been no evidence of human health risks. Despite these lowconcentrations, testing was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of ozonation processes atMetropolitan’s water treatment plants to further limit CECs and their potential risks using StateProject water (SPW), Colorado River water (CRW) and SPW/CRW blends. The five CECsselected for evaluating included atrazine, caffeine, carbamazepine, primidone, and tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP).Prior to evaluating CEC removal, the removal of taste and odor compounds (2-methylisoborneol[MIB] and geosmin) using the bench-scale O_3 and O_3/H_2O_2 apparatus was conducted to establishbench-scale ozonation conditions that would result in similar oxidation conditions and removalsas found in Metropolitan’s full-scale plants. These studies evaluated MIB and geosmin removalfrom potential stripping by oxygen gas flow and oxidation.Initial results indicated that the bench-scale system could be operated to achieve similaroxidation conditions and removals for MIB and geosmin as seen in full-scale plants. Phase Ⅰbench-scale studies showed that over a range of ozonation conditions for waters spiked withCECs at 100 ng/L, ozone was effective for removing carbamazepine at greater than 99 percent,caffeine at greater than 82 percent, and primidone at greater than 47 percent; atrazine removalwas limited showing less than 54 percent removal. Ozonation was not effective for TCEPremoval.Results for Phase Ⅱ of the bench-scale studies, which included O_3/H_2O_2 testing, showed thatunder the same ozone dosages used in Phase Ⅰ studies, O_3 and O_3/H_2O_2 were effective forremoving carbamazepine at greater than 99 percent and primidone at greater than 47 percent;caffeine at greater than 70 percent; atrazine removal was limited below 56 percent removal. O_3and O_3/H_2O_2 was not effective for TCEP removal. However, increasing the H_2O_2 dose mayincrease TCEP removal. In general, O_3/H_2O_2 enhanced primidone and atrazine removals.Results also showed that O_3 and O_3/H_2O_2 oxidation of primidone and atrazine resulted in slightlyhigher percent removals in SPW than in CRW and SPW/CRW blends.
机译:替代臭氧(O_3)和O_3与过氧化氢(H_2O_2)测试组合 进行评估添加所添加的出现问题的选定成分(CEC)的去除 南加州大都市水域(大都会)的源水域。什么时候 检测到,大都市的源头和成品水域中的CEC已经处于低NG / L范围 - 没有人体健康风险证据的水平。尽管很低 浓度,进行测试以评估臭氧处理过程的有效性 大都市的水处理厂利用国家进一步限制CEC及其潜在风险 项目水(SPW),科罗拉多河水(CRW)和SPW / CRW混合。五个CEC 选择评估包括阿特拉嗪,咖啡因,卡巴马嗪,Primidone和Tris(2- 氯乙基)磷酸盐(TCEP)。 在评估CEC的去除之前,去除味道和异味化合物(2-甲基甲基甲醇 进行了使用台级O_3和O_3 / H_2O_2装置的[MIB]和Geosmin以建立 基准尺度臭氧化条件将导致类似的氧化条件和去除 如都洛多兰的全尺寸植物。这些研究评估了MIB和Geosmin去除 从潜在剥离通过氧气流量和氧化。 初始结果表明,可以操作台阶系统以实现类似的系统 在全尺寸植物中看到的MIB和Geosmin的氧化条件和除去。阶段Ⅰ 长凳规模研究表明,在一系列水域飙升的臭氧条件下 臭氧在100ng / L的CEC,臭氧可用于移除大于99%的卡吡嗪, 咖啡因大于82%,原酮,大于47%;阿特拉津删除 有限地显示少于54%的拆除。 Ozonation对TCEP无效 移动。 结果Ⅱ期Ⅱ阶段研究,其中包括O_3 / H_2O_2检测,显示了 在Ⅰ期研究中使用的相同臭氧剂量下,O_3和O_3 / H_2O_2有效 除去大于99%的小植物素,Primidone大于47%; 咖啡因大于70%;取出的去除率低于56%的去除量。 O_3. o_3 / h_2o_2对TCEP拆卸无效。但是,增加H_2O_2剂量可能 增加TCEP删除。通常,O_3 / h_2O_2增强的primidone和阿特拉津去除。 结果还表明,O_3和O_3 / h_2O_2原酮和阿特拉津的氧化略微产生 在SPW中的更高百分比比在CRW和SPW / CRW混合物中除去。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号