首页> 外文会议>AIAA SPACE conference exposition >Does Commercial Space Really Need MOA?
【24h】

Does Commercial Space Really Need MOA?

机译:商业空间真的需要MOA吗?

获取原文

摘要

The Mission Operations Assurance (MOA) discipline actively participates as a project member to achieve their common objective of full mission success while also providing an independent risk assessment to the Project Manager. The cornerstone element of MOA is the independent assessment of the risks the project faces in executing its mission. Especially as the project approaches critical mission events, it becomes imperative to clearly identify and assess the risks the project faces. This has been the paradigm for robotic space exploration missions, but does the same apply to commercial space operations? This is the question which is the driver for this year's MOA track at the 18th Annual Improving Space Operations workshop in April at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and the question we examine in this paper. Corollaries to this driving question are why shouldn't MOA apply and are there factors beyond mission success with acceptable risk which apply to commercial space operations that are not present in government scientific missions? To address these questions, areas we focus on include risk (both mission and profit) management for commercial space operations and the practical extension of robotic mission MOA to commercial space operations. Another key area to look at is command file errors which are a major concern for deep space robotic missions, but can we worry about them less with manned missions or unmanned supply mission? Further, with the growing concern about space debris, we delve into the role of MOA relative to End-of-Mission activities. This paper examines these topics and in particular the perspectives presented at the workshop to begin charting the appropriate course for MOA in the emerging sector of Commercial Space Operations.
机译:特派团行动保证(MOA)学科作为项目成员积极参与,以实现他们的全面任务成功的共同目标,同时还向项目经理提供独立的风险评估。 MOA的基础是对项目执行任务时面临的风险进行独立评估。特别是在项目接近关键任务事件时,必须明确识别和评估项目面临的风险。这一直是机器人太空探索任务的范例,但是否同样适用于商业太空操作?这个问题是今年4月在喷气推进实验室举行的第18届年度空间改进太空研讨会上MOA轨道的推动力,也是我们在本文中研究的问题。这个驱动问题的推论是,为什么不应该应用MOA?除了成功完成任务之外,还有其他风险和可接受的风险,这些因素是否适用于政府科学任务中不存在的商业太空操作?为了解决这些问题,我们重点关注的领域包括用于商业空间操作的风险(任务和利润)管理,以及将机器人任务MOA实际扩展到商业空间操作。另一个需要关注的关键领域是命令文件错误,这是深空机器人任务的主要关注点,但是我们是否可以减少有人值守任务或无人值守任务的麻烦呢?此外,随着对空间碎片的日益关注,我们深入研究了MOA在任务结束活动中的作用。本文研究了这些主题,尤其是研讨会上提出的观点,以开始为新兴的商业空间运营部门的MOA制定适当的路线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号