首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management >An x-bar control chart economic design sampling strategy for non-normally distributed data under gamma (#x03BB;, 2) failure models
【24h】

An x-bar control chart economic design sampling strategy for non-normally distributed data under gamma (#x03BB;, 2) failure models

机译:γ(λ,2)故障模型下的非正常分布数据的X型栏控制图经济设计采样策略

获取原文

摘要

This study compares an x-bar control chart economic design with a variable sampling interval (VSI) and a fixed-length sampling (FSI) for non-normal data under Gamma (λ, 2) shock models. In earlier investigations, constant sampling intervals were widely employed by the control chart’s designers and users because of their administrative simplicity. Most control chart economic designs assumed the failure mechanism, which belongs to the Poisson distribution. However, this is not usually pragmatic. Banerjee and Rahim (1993) presented a cost model using VSI under a process-failure mechanism that followed a Gamma (λ, 2) model with an increased hazard rate. These subgroup measurements were assumed to be normally distributed when designing control charts. However, that assumption may not be tenable in this research. Hence, this study employs a numerical example to indicate the solution procedure and to implement the sensitivity analysis while comparing the results of using various sampling interval approaches in non-normally distributed data.
机译:该研究将X型杆控制图经济设计与可变采样间隔(VSI)和固定长度采样(FSI)进行比较,用于伽马(λ,2)冲击模型下的非正常数据。在早期的调查中,由于行政简单,控制图表的设计人员和用户广泛采用恒定的采样间隔。大多数控制图经济设计假设失败机制,属于泊松分布。但是,这通常不是务实的。 Banerjee和Rahim(1993)在一个过程中使用VSI呈现了一种成本模型,该过程发生故障机制,其遵循哈马(λ,2)模型,危险率增加。假设这些子组测量通常在设计控制图表时正常分发。然而,在这项研究中,假设可能不可达到。因此,该研究采用数值示例来指示解决方案过程并在比较使用非正常分布数据中的各种采样间隔方法的结果的同时实现灵敏度分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号