首页> 外文会议>European Optical Society annual meeting >Light scattering: From academic research towards industrial applications
【24h】

Light scattering: From academic research towards industrial applications

机译:光散射:从学术研究到工业应用

获取原文

摘要

For a substantial part of the optics community, light scattering for a long time has been seen as a mystical phenomenon, difficult to measure, difficult to interpret, and for the most part only relevant for "those high-end applications". This is however not true anymore and those ignorantly neglecting light scattering risk to be left behind in the near future. With today's possibilities to reduce the size of optical systems and to reduce the number of optical elements while at the same time continuously pushing performance, the demands on optical elements are steadily increasing. While the first issue to solve for most optical elements is still shape accuracy or figure, light scattering effects have to be considered right after that or even at the same time. This is not trivial, but it is also not impossible. Part of the problem is the complexity of imperfections of optical components and systems. Another part is the scattering community itself - developing extremely sophisticated and highly accurate theories to model scattering, but sometimes failing to see scattering problems from the perspective of a manufacturer or use the insight into scattering to give the manufacturer hints in their language to improve their products. Interestingly, one of the brightest people in the light scattering community and the first to introduce the so called Rayleigh-Rice vector perturbation to the optics world, Eugene Church, did exactly that. Before other people developed all sorts of new calculations based on Maxwell's equations, he just used a simple formula known in the Radar community linking electromagnetic scattering to surface irregularities (roughness) in order to support the manufacturing of diamond-turned optics. Despite all the discussions among experts on little details, we do know that this simple formula is highly accurate and produces the same results as rigorous numerical calculations. Moreover, in contrast to numerical calculations, the simple expression linking scattering and surface roughness can easily be used to quickly estimate scattering based on roughness data (in the relevant range of course) or even to use light scattering measurements as a tool to retrieve information on the roughness of a surface. Using light scattering to measure surface roughness has some exclusive advantages over all other methods: 1 It is non-contact 2 It is insensitive to sample or sensor vibrations 3 Rms-roughness can be measured directly in the spatial frequency range relevant for the optical application 4 The surface power spectral density function (roughness spectrum) is measured directly without the need to Fourier transform 5 Roughness well below 1 nm rms and particles / features with diameters much smaller than the wavelength can be measured 6 Statistically, one typical scatter-based roughness measurement has a robustness of hundreds or even thousands of topographic roughness measurements 7 Scatter-based metrology can be so fast that even large surfaces can be fully scanned for 100% quality control In our presentation, we will briefly discuss simplified scatter models and how to use them in practical applications. We will also try to illustrate the advantages of scatter-based surface characterization for freeform mirrors by showing our latest results obtained using a robotic scatter sensor. Future work will focus on a simplified general approach for optical design and manufacturing that should include scattering effects by: 1 Analysis of potential imperfections (roughness, defects, material imperfections, coatings, SSD, ...) 2 Estimating the impact of different imperfections onto performance 3 Identify most critical contribution(s) 4 Find pragmatic ways to specify and measure these imperfections 5 Provide reliable measurement procedures and data to characterize the overall performance of the final product.
机译:对于大部分光学界,很长一段时间的光散射被视为神秘的现象,难以衡量,难以解释,以及大多数情况下只有对“那些高端应用”相关。然而,这不再是真实的,并且那些在不久的将来留下了忽视光散射风险的人。随着当今的可能性来减小光学系统的尺寸并减少光学元件的数量,同时连续推动性能,对光学元件的要求稳步增加。虽然为大多数光学元素解决的第一个问题仍然是形状的精度或数字,但在此之后或甚至在同一时间之后必须考虑光散射效果。这不是微不足道的,但这也不是不可能的。部分问题是光学元件和系统缺陷的复杂性。另一部分是散射社区本身 - 开发出极复杂和高度准确的模型散射的理论,但有时无法从制造商的角度看到散射问题,或者使用洞察散射,以便以他们的语言给出制造商提示以改善其产品。有趣的是,光散射社区中最聪明的人之一和第一个介绍所谓的瑞利米矢量扰动,尤金教会,确实如此。在其他人开发了基于Maxwell方程的各种新计算之前,他刚刚在雷达社区中已知的简单公式将电磁散射连接到表面不规则(粗糙度),以支持菱形光学器件的制造。尽管在小细节上专家之间进行了所有讨论,但我们知道这种简单的公式高度准确,并产生与严格数值计算相同的结果。此外,与数值计算相比,可以容易地使用简单的表达式链接散射和表面粗糙度来快速地基于粗糙度数据(当然在相关范围)中的散射,甚至使用光散射测量作为检索信息的工具表面的粗糙度。利用光散射测量表面粗糙度具有一些完全优势的所有其他方法:1是非接触式2,它对样品或传感器振动不敏感,可以直接测量3个RMS粗糙度,该空间频率范围与光学应用4相关。表面功率谱密度函数(粗糙度频谱)直接测量,无需傅立叶变换5粗糙度低于1nm rms,并且直径远小于波长的颗粒/特征可以在统计上测量,一个典型的散射基粗糙度测量具有数百甚至数千个地形粗糙度测量的稳健性7,基于散射的计量可能会如此之快,即使在我们的演示文稿中也可以完全扫描100%质量控制的甚至大表面,我们将简要讨论简化的散点模型以及如何使用它们在实际应用中。我们还将尝试通过显示使用机器人散射传感器获得的最新结果来说明基于散射的表面表征的优点。未来的工作将专注于一种简化的光学设计和制造方法,这些方法应包括散射效果:1分析潜在的缺陷(粗糙度,缺陷,材料缺陷,涂料,SSD,...)2估算不同缺陷的影响性能3确定最关键的贡献4找到了指定和衡量这些缺陷5的务实方式,提供可靠的测量程序和数据,以表征最终产品的整体性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号