首页> 外文会议>Residuals and Biosolids Conference >What Do You Feed a Hungry Digester? Assessing the Market for Co-Digestion in Central Maine
【24h】

What Do You Feed a Hungry Digester? Assessing the Market for Co-Digestion in Central Maine

机译:您要喂什么饿的消化器?评估缅因州中部共同消化市场

获取原文

摘要

If you have excess capacity in an anaerobic digester, don’t you want to put it to work? The biggestchallenge, though, is finding consistent, reliable high-strength organic waste streams to feed the hungrybugs. Interest in co-digestion in municipal digesters is expanding, but many project promoters arereporting the challenge of finding appropriate supplemental waste streams.The Lewiston-Auburn Water Pollution Control Authority (LAWPCA) has begun construction of a newanaerobic digestion system. With LAWPCA staff and CDM, NEBRA analyzed the potential outsidewaste streams that may be appropriate for addition to the new digesters. This paper reports on thefindings of that study. Phone interviews were conducted with state environmental and planningagency staff, managers of wastewater and biosolids from facilities around southern Maine, andgenerators of other high-strength organic wastes within 100 miles of the LAWPCA facility.It proved difficult to determine with certainty what outside wastes would most likely be drawn toLAWPCA for disposal. However, it is clear that there is a need in the region for disposal options forfats, oils, and grease (FOG), and LAWPCA would be providing a much-needed service by providing areliable, cost-effective option for FOG. In addition, generators of some food processing and glycolwastes expressed considerable interest in the possibility of a future disposal option at LAWPCA’sfacility.In order to attract the desired wastes in consistent volumes, the pricing for disposal has to becompetitive. In terms of pricing and availability, the study results indicate that FOG, waste from afood processor, and glycols from a plastics manufacturer are the three most promising outside wastestreams for LAWPCA. The estimated gross tipping fees for these wastes range on the order of$50,000 to $150,000 per year based on accepting an average of 3,000 to 6,000 total gallons per day.There are numerous uncertainties that make it a challenge to decision-makers to consider co-digestion.Foremost is that, with all of the current interest in anaerobic digestion and diversion of organic wastes,there is growing competition for these wastes, and generators are playing the market and unwilling tosign long-term contracts, expecting that better pricing is just around the corner. In addition, thestruggling economy has reduced activity and waste streams, resulting in competition from landfills andlow or no cost options, such as composting and feeding to animals. However, the bright side forLAWPCA is that, in a competitive environment, with the major cost of digester construction paid for,the facility has the opportunity to get ahead of private digestion options and should be able to offercompetitive pricing.
机译:如果您的厌氧消化池容量过大,您是否不想使用它?最大的 然而,挑战在于找到一致,可靠的高强度有机废物流来喂养饥饿的人 错误。人们对市政沼气池共消化的兴趣正在扩大,但许多项目发起人正在 报告寻找合适的补充废物流的挑战。 Lewiston-Auburn水污染控制局(LAWPCA)已开始建设新的 厌氧消化系统。与LAWPCA员工和CDM一起,NEBRA分析了外部潜力 可能适合添加到新消化池中的废物流。本文报告了 该研究的发现。对州环境和规划进行了电话采访 代理商人员,缅因州南部地区设施废水和生物固体的经理,以及 距LAWPCA设施100英里范围内的其他高强度有机废物的产生者。 事实证明,很难确定哪些外部废物最有可能被吸引到 LAWPCA进行处置。但是,很明显,该地区需要为 油脂,而LAWPCA将通过提供 可靠,经济高效的FOG选项。此外,一些食品加工和乙二醇的发生器 废物对LAWPCA的未来处置方案的可能性表示了极大的兴趣 设施。 为了以一致的数量吸引所需的废物,处置的价格必须为 竞争的。在定价和可得性方面,研究结果表明FOG是 食品加工商和塑料制造商生产的乙二醇是三种最有希望的外部废物 流向LAWPCA。这些废物的估计小费总额约为 每年平均接受3,000至6,000加仑,则为$ 50,000至$ 150,000。 存在许多不确定因素,这给决策者考虑共同消化带来了挑战。 最重要的是,在目前对厌氧消化和有机废物转移的所有关注中, 这些废物的竞争日益激烈,而发电机正在市场上竞争,并且不愿意 签订长期合同,期望更好的定价指日可待。除此之外 挣扎的经济减少了活动和废物流,导致了垃圾填埋场和垃圾填埋场的竞争。 低成本或无成本的选择,例如堆肥和动物饲养。然而,光明的一面 LAWPCA认为,在竞争激烈的环境中,沼气池建设的主要费用已付清, 该设施有机会领先于私人消化选择,并且应该能够提供 有竞争力的价格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号