首页> 外文会议>GeoCongress 2012 >Evaluation of AASHTO load factor and resistance design methods for benchmarked braced excavations
【24h】

Evaluation of AASHTO load factor and resistance design methods for benchmarked braced excavations

机译:基准支撑开挖的AASHTO荷载系数和阻力设计方法评估

获取原文

摘要

To evaluate the effects of load factor and resistance design on current design practice, a limited number of constructed and monitored braced excavations are first benchmarked with a non-linear analysis approach. The obtained benchmarked models are then reanalyzed with AASHTO (2010) LRFD factors applied in separate design case scenarios. Each analysis is carried out with both limit equilibrium and non-linear analysis methods. Subsequently, results from all combinations are evaluated and compared. The results of this LRFD exercise have been particularly revealing. In many cases, the design methods fail to produce adequate safety factors for wall moment or support reactions compared to the benchmarked models. Whilst a seasoned professional would quickly realize these design code misbehaviors, a not so experienced engineer might blindly produce code consistent designs that are clearly unsafe regarding some critical aspects. For this reason, the authors encourage that noted LRFD inconsistencies are officially addressed in the near future.
机译:为了评估载荷系数和阻力设计对当前设计实践的影响,首先使用非线性分析方法对有限数量的施工和监测支撑开挖进行基准测试。然后,将获得的基准模型与应用于单独设计案例场景的AASHTO(2010)LRFD因素重新分析。每种分析均采用极限平衡法和非线性分析法进行。随后,评估并比较所有组合的结果。 LRFD练习的结果特别具有启发性。与基准模型相比,在许多情况下,设计方法无法为墙矩或支撑反应产生足够的安全系数。尽管经验丰富的专业人员会很快意识到这些设计代码的不良行为,但经验不足的工程师可能会盲目地编写代码一致的设计,这些设计对于某些关键方面显然是不安全的。因此,作者鼓励在不久的将来正式解决已指出的LRFD不一致问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号