首页> 外文会议>World energy engineering congress;WEEC 2011 >Energy Return Ratio: Chief Criterion for a Non-Depleting Energy Future
【24h】

Energy Return Ratio: Chief Criterion for a Non-Depleting Energy Future

机译:能源回报率:未来不耗尽能源的主要标准

获取原文

摘要

If an investment is intended to produce energy or to save energy, it should be judged on the basis of the net amount of energy that it promises to produce or save. Yet, this seemingly obvious criterion is commonly ignored. This is one of the biggest flaws in analyzing energy investments today. To correct this situation, we recommend that the first criterion used in assessing any energy project should be a simple ratio, the Energy Return Ratio (ERR). It is the ratio of the energy produced by the project to the energy required to create and sustain the project. The Energy Return Ratio is determined by the laws of physics. It is immutable. It directly indicates the effectiveness of a project in doing what we want to achieve, which is to produce or to save net energy. In contrast, a calculation of financial return is subject to distortions that obscure the fundamental value of the project. These include interest rates, government subsidies, and business deals that occur in the background. Such factors can make the intrinsic worth of projects impossible for investors to judge. For example, the present growth of wind farms is largely motivated by government subsidies and utility mandates, which invites financial speculation that may occur at the expense of taxpayers and gullible investors. With only financial information available, we don't know whether wind energy is fundamentally a good thing or a sucker trap. Thus, the Energy Return Ratio also provides a check on the financial soundness of an energy project. If the ERR of a project is low, the financial rate of return is built over quicksand, and the project is likely to collapse.The ERR is a valuable first criterion for any kind of energy project. It is important for the production of conventional fuels, for derived or synthetic fuels, and for energy conservation projects. ERR analysis of such projects is simple, at least in principle. Applying the ERR becomes more complex and more interesting when applied to the transition from conventional energy sources to non-depleting energy sources. In this transition, an energy project has multiple generations, in which the energy from the first generation is used to build later generations. For example, a wind farm is built with conventional energy, harvests non-depleting energy from the environment, and uses all or part of the harvested energy to build additional wind farms. Analyzing this process on the basis of ERR yields important lessons that should guide investment and public policy in making the transition to nondepleting energy sources. Discovering those lessons is the subject of this discussion.
机译:如果一项投资旨在生产能源或节省能源,则应根据其承诺生产或节省的能源净量来进行判断。但是,这个看似显而易见的标准通常被忽略。这是当今分析能源投资的最大缺陷之一。为了纠正这种情况,我们建议在评估任何能源项目时使用的第一个标准应该是一个简单的比率,即能量回报率(ERR)。它是项目产生的能量与创建和维持项目所需的能量之比。能量返回比由物理定律确定。这是一成不变的。它直接表明了项目在完成我们想要实现的目标(即生产或节省净能源)方面的有效性。相比之下,财务收益的计算容易使项目的基本价值模糊不清。这些包括在后台发生的利率,政府补贴和商业交易。这些因素会使投资者无法判断项目的内在价值。例如,当前风电场的增长很大程度上是由政府补贴和公用事业指令驱动的,这引发了可能以牺牲纳税人和易变的投资者为代价的金融投机活动。仅提供财务信息,我们不知道风能从根本上说是好事还是诱人的陷阱。因此,能源回报率还可以检查能源项目的财务状况。如果一个项目的ERR低,那么财务收益率就建立在流沙之上,并且该项目很可能会崩溃。ERR是任何能源项目的有价值的第一准则。对于生产常规燃料,衍生燃料或合成燃料以及节能项目而言,这一点很重要。至少在原理上,对此类项目的ERR分析很简单。当将ERR应用于从常规能源到非消耗能源的过渡时,应用ERR变得更加复杂和有趣。在此过渡中,一个能源项目有多代人,其中第一代人的能源被用于建造后代人。例如,使用常规能源建造风电场,从环境中收集非消耗性能源,并使用全部或部分收集的能源来建设其他风电场。在ERR的基础上对该过程进行分析得出了重要的经验教训,这些经验教训应指导投资和公共政策向非消耗性能源的过渡。发现这些教训是本讨论的主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号