首页> 外文会议>2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference >Energy Efficient Evolution of Mobile Networks: Macro-Only Upgrades vs. a Joint-Pico Deployment Strategy
【24h】

Energy Efficient Evolution of Mobile Networks: Macro-Only Upgrades vs. a Joint-Pico Deployment Strategy

机译:移动网络的节能演进:仅宏升级与联合微型部署策略

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

With the increasing popularity of mobile broadband, mobile network operators (MNOs) are experiencing a continuous boost in network traffic. Some MNOs have stopped offering unlimited data plans, replacing them with a variety of data bundles. At the same time operators are looking at the different options for how to evolve their networks, allowing them to carry the expected increase in traffic. The best solution is generally selected based on two main criteria, performance and cost. However, pushed by a variety of environmental and energy challenges, MNOs are now also showing interest in understanding the impact that different options can have on the energy consumption of their networks. This paper investigates the possible energy gains of evolving a mobile network through a joint pico deployment and macro upgrade solution over a period of 8 years. Besides the network energy consumption, energy efficiency in Mbps/kW is also analyzed. Furthermore, a cost analysis is carried out, to give a more complete picture of the different options being considered. Focusing on the last year of the evolution analysis, results show that deploying more pico sites reduces the energy consumption of the network, by a maximum of 30%. With regards to the energy efficiency, high deployment of pico sites allowed the network to carry 16% more traffic for the same amount of energy. This, however, results in an increase in cost, specifically operational costs.
机译:随着移动宽带的日益普及,移动网络运营商(MNO)的网络流量不断增长。一些MNO已停止提供无限的数据计划,而将其替换为各种数据包。同时,运营商正在寻找如何发展其网络的不同选择,从而使他们能够承载预期的流量增长。通常根据性能和成本这两个主要标准选择最佳解决方案。但是,在各种环境和能源挑战的推动下,移动网络运营商现在也表现出了对了解不同选择方案对其网络能耗的影响的兴趣。本文研究了在8年的时间内通过联合的pico部署和宏升级解决方案来发展移动网络可能带来的能量收益。除了网络能耗外,还分析了以Mbps / kW为单位的能效。此外,还进行了成本分析,以更全面地了解所考虑的不同选择。结果以去年的演变分析为重点,结果表明,部署更多的微微站点可以最大程度地降低网络的能耗30%。关于能源效率,微微站点的高度部署使网络在相同数量的能源下可以承载16%的流量。然而,这导致成本,特别是运营成本的增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号